1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0190-9622(97)70106-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term results after CO2 laser skin resurfacing: a comparison of scanned and pulsed systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
67
1
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
67
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hypothesized mechanisms have included collagen contraction, physical ablation of photodamaged tissue, and neocollagenesis. 1,3,4,[13][14][15] Although clinical cutaneous rejuvenation may actually be based on a combination of these factors, we sought to examine in detail the latter aspect of laser resurfacing. Several studies have examined new collagen formation after laser resurfacing from a histologic standpoint, but, to our knowledge, there has been no prior detailed quantitative examination of the changes in collagen and several key genes involved in dermal remodeling after CO 2 laser treatment.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hypothesized mechanisms have included collagen contraction, physical ablation of photodamaged tissue, and neocollagenesis. 1,3,4,[13][14][15] Although clinical cutaneous rejuvenation may actually be based on a combination of these factors, we sought to examine in detail the latter aspect of laser resurfacing. Several studies have examined new collagen formation after laser resurfacing from a histologic standpoint, but, to our knowledge, there has been no prior detailed quantitative examination of the changes in collagen and several key genes involved in dermal remodeling after CO 2 laser treatment.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The replicas proved difficult to use. Ross et al 13 found good correlation between replicas and clinical photographs in their study.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Collagen remodeling and wound contraction is believed to continue for at least 1 year with both resurfacing methods. Ross et al 13 showed a trend toward improvement in wrinkles between 2 months and 1 year after laser resurfacing; however, the improvement was not statistically significant. Manuskiatti et al 14 found comparable improvement in wrinkles 3 months and 2 years after laser resurfacing.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…15 Seckel 16 found a new layer of collagen present at 1 and 2 months but not at 3 months after resurfacing, suggesting that the zone of repair is not a long-term finding. Other clinical studies 17 have found a maintained growth in the collagen repair zone. Wrinkle improvement in patients who have undergone resurfacing appears to increase between months 1 and 6, suggesting that fibroblast activity and collagen remodeling occur during this period to form a sustained band of fibrosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%