2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(02)00030-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term results after posterior fixation of thoraco-lumbar burst fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
66
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
66
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Fractures of the thoracolumbar spine are major injuries that often require surgical intervention and are known to have an important impact on the long-term outcome after trauma [1]. Most of the studies on the outcome after fractures of the thoracolumbar spine focused on radiological parameters, return to work, activity, and pain [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] without consideration of specific HRQoL outcome measures. Assessment of HRQoL after thoracolumbar fractures with generic instruments such as Short Form-36 health survey (SF-36) has only been reported in a few works [1,[17][18][19][20], which are all limited by the low number of the used HRQoL instruments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fractures of the thoracolumbar spine are major injuries that often require surgical intervention and are known to have an important impact on the long-term outcome after trauma [1]. Most of the studies on the outcome after fractures of the thoracolumbar spine focused on radiological parameters, return to work, activity, and pain [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] without consideration of specific HRQoL outcome measures. Assessment of HRQoL after thoracolumbar fractures with generic instruments such as Short Form-36 health survey (SF-36) has only been reported in a few works [1,[17][18][19][20], which are all limited by the low number of the used HRQoL instruments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indications for operative treatment may include neurologic deficit, unstable fracture, severe kyphosis greater than 35°, canal compromise greater than 50%, or posterior ligamentous complex injury [18,38]. Other arguments for surgery include decreased rates of neurologic deterioration, improved kyphosis correction, and facilitation of early mobilization that may decrease complications from prolonged bed rest [1,5,45].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is associated with kyphosis progression of 1°to 8.3°, spontaneous spinal canal remodeling (from an average of 26% to 36% compression at the time of injury to 12% to 18% at last followup) [3, 4, 10-14, 27, 41, 44], and rare cases of neurologic deterioration [21,34]. Observational studies of operative treatment suggest the majority of patients experience satisfactory pain and functional outcomes, kyphosis correction of 0.5°to 10.2°, reduction in canal stenosis, and no neurologic deterioration at last followup [1,2,5,10,11,21,27,41,42,52].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modern surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fractures is based on posterior transpedicular fixation techniques, which are angular stable and can provide an excellent stability in the three planes of the space [2]. After its introduction, the exclusive dorsal pedicle screw instrumentation with or without transpedicular bone grafting became widely popular and a standard procedure for stabilizing the injured thoracolumbar spine [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After its introduction, the exclusive dorsal pedicle screw instrumentation with or without transpedicular bone grafting became widely popular and a standard procedure for stabilizing the injured thoracolumbar spine [13]. But the long-term results of this approach today are controversial due to inconsistent reports and to a paucity of data on late outcome [2] and several authors reported increasing instability or a loss in kyphotic correction of the repaired spinal segment [12,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%