2018
DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2018.1431402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term results of atresiaplasty in patients with congenital aural atresia

Abstract: Surgery for CAA is a demanding operation with variable anatomical and hearing outcomes. Atresiaplasty operations should be centralized to hospitals with large numbers of such patients to ensure sufficient levels of surgical experience. Bone-anchored hearing devices or middle-ear implants should be considered as a first-line option because they offer good hearing predictability.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A postoperative mean hearing threshold of ≤30 dB HL has been reported to be a good hearing result in patients with microtia-atresia (3,7,27). All 59 of our patients attained this threshold.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A postoperative mean hearing threshold of ≤30 dB HL has been reported to be a good hearing result in patients with microtia-atresia (3,7,27). All 59 of our patients attained this threshold.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, this procedure is difficult because of altered landmarks, abnormal anatomy of the facial nerve, and the limited space of the middle ear. Furthermore, reconstruction of the externa ear canal requires long-term follow-up, and complications such as canal restenosis and chronic infections are common (3). Surgical attempts at ear canal reconstruction may be considered unreasonable or risky, and these procedures should be performed only in patients who meet specific anatomic criteria (4,5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7] Adequate benefit from conventional hearing rehabilitation, including canalplasty and ossiculoplasty, can be difficult to achieve due to insufficient hearing improvement, skin problems, inflammation, tympanic membrane lateralization, and restenosis of the reconstructed ear canal. 8,9 Many individuals seek other surgical interventions to improve their hearing. In 2006, a new treatment option with an active middle ear implant-the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) (Med-EL, Innsbruck, Austria)-was first reported by Colletti and colleagues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microtia patients have three main problems, namely functional, aesthetic, and psychosocial problems [1]. Microtia surgery has been proved to lower psychological stressors which may impact the mental development of children with microtia [2]. Hearing habilitation for infants and children with microtia who are still in developing age should be performed without waiting for reconstructive surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When children become old enough to undergo ear reconstruction surgery, hearing habilitation can be assisted by performing atresiaplasty. Hearing improvement becomes one of valuable outcomes of microtia reconstruction surgery [2]. About 64% patients gain significant hearing improvement after atresiaplasty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%