1992
DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90365-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term results of directional coronary atherectomy: Predictors of restenosis

Abstract: Six-month angiographic follow-up of patients who underwent directional coronary atherectomy during the 1st 3 years of our experience shows an overall restenosis rate of 32%, with lower rates in patients with a postatherectomy lumen diameter > or = 3 mm, cholesterol level < or = 200 mg/dl or a recent myocardial infarction. Few if any events relating to the site of atherectomy developed after the 1st year of follow-up.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Deep arterial wall excision is not generally associated with an increased incidence of restenosis. 21,22) However, this was not supported by the results of another study in which the presence of internal elastic lamina and media in higher percentage of patients of restenosis.…”
Section: Calcificationcontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Deep arterial wall excision is not generally associated with an increased incidence of restenosis. 21,22) However, this was not supported by the results of another study in which the presence of internal elastic lamina and media in higher percentage of patients of restenosis.…”
Section: Calcificationcontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…In the pre-stent era it ranged between 32-55% of all angioplasties, and drop to 17-41% (8)(9)(10)(11) in the BMS era (12)(13)(14). A further step to reduce restenosis was undertaken with the advent of DES, with a reduction to numbers <10% (15,16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of CAVEAT and CCAT all but eliminated DCA from consideration for catheter based revascularization of intermediate sized vessels. It has since been speculated, however, that the CAVEAT in-vestigators could have achieved even larger luminal diameters had they used larger devices and performed more extensive tissue removal [7,8], as has been safely performed in other, single-center studies [9,10]. It was shown in CAVEAT that immediate results are highly predictive of late angiographic results for both DCA and angioplasty, suggesting that a larger immediate luminal diameter might correlate with even better long-term results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%