2006
DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2006.11679868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Results of Primary Stenting for Long and Complex Iliac Artery Occlusions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nineteen studies were included in the systematic review. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] Four studies originated from two study groups but considered different patient groups and were not excluded. 25,31,33,37 The chance adjusted inter-reviewer agreement for study eligibility () was 0.76.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nineteen studies were included in the systematic review. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] Four studies originated from two study groups but considered different patient groups and were not excluded. 25,31,33,37 The chance adjusted inter-reviewer agreement for study eligibility () was 0.76.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the endovascular era, endoluminal treatment has been shown in certain situations to be a comparable option for iliac occlusive disease. [7][8][9][10][11] However, it is not a suitable stand-alone therapy in the presence of significant CFA disease. 12 We have previously reported our initial experience with combined common femoral endarterectomy and EIA stenting as a means to treat TASC C iliac lesions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…At follow-up, 15 patients (50%) were asymptomatic, 13 presented long distance claudication (Rutherford category 1) and two presented moderate distance claudication. The mean neointimal hyperplasia volume was 766.26 mm 3 (minimum of 204 mm 3 and maximum of 1774 mm 3 ). The intrastent occlusion rate caused by neointimal hyperplasia ranged from 18% to 47% (mean, 27.4%) (Figure 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%