2015
DOI: 10.1002/smrj.42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long‐Term Results of Reconstructive Surgery for Peyronie's Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(183 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally, the management of patients with PD and refractory ED consisted of the placement of a PP, with additional straightening manoeuvers to guarantee adequate rigidity and curvature correction [15][16][17][20][21][22][23]. Although the current guidelines suggest that the aim of surgery is to guarantee a penis straight and hard enough for penetrative sexual intercourse, the recent evidence suggests that most patients with PD are bothered by the loss of length associated with the disease and that further loss in length due to the surgical correction leads to additional bother, irrespective of the magnitude of the loss [4][5][6]. Furthermore, patients with PD undergoing PP implantation report the lowest satisfaction scores among the PP implant population, mainly because of the shortening and the change of shape of their penis [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traditionally, the management of patients with PD and refractory ED consisted of the placement of a PP, with additional straightening manoeuvers to guarantee adequate rigidity and curvature correction [15][16][17][20][21][22][23]. Although the current guidelines suggest that the aim of surgery is to guarantee a penis straight and hard enough for penetrative sexual intercourse, the recent evidence suggests that most patients with PD are bothered by the loss of length associated with the disease and that further loss in length due to the surgical correction leads to additional bother, irrespective of the magnitude of the loss [4][5][6]. Furthermore, patients with PD undergoing PP implantation report the lowest satisfaction scores among the PP implant population, mainly because of the shortening and the change of shape of their penis [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diffuse cardiovascular disease, as well as the change in interface between the corpus cavernosum and the tunica albuginea caused by the formation of the plaque, may explain the progressive worsening of the quality of the erection, which is a common finding in this group of patients . Therefore, the quality of life of sexually active patients with PD and their partners is often severely affected, and this may cause depression, low self‐esteem, and difficulty in the relationship with the partner .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grafts needed were harvested as described by Eppley et al (16). The corporoplasty procedures were done essentially the same way as for all others grafting techniques (17). Circumcisions were made by a "sleeve technique" or a "forceps-guided method".…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grafting surgery becomes essential when penile deformities become handicapping to the patient both cosmetically and functionally, as having an acute angle of curvature beyond 60°, a pathologically short penis, a hinging penis due to an hourglass deformity, or a penis incapable of penetrative sexual intercourse 4,5 . However, due to the progressive nature of the disease, surgical correction must never be conducted before the plaque has stabilized for over not less than 12 to 18 months and becomes painless 6 . A typical preoperative erectile rigidity is a mandatory prerequisite for grafting to be the only treatment.…”
Section: Preoperative Considerations: (Patient Selection/patient Pre‐mentioning
confidence: 99%