2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term results of temperature-controlled endobiliary radiofrequency ablation in a normal swine model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were no adverse events, such as bile duct perforation or bleeding, in the 12 mini pigs used in that study. In another animal study, the long‐term effects of endobiliary RFA included the development of segmental stricture with cholangitis, but neither bleeding nor perforation was observed during the 28 days after endobiliary RFA …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There were no adverse events, such as bile duct perforation or bleeding, in the 12 mini pigs used in that study. In another animal study, the long‐term effects of endobiliary RFA included the development of segmental stricture with cholangitis, but neither bleeding nor perforation was observed during the 28 days after endobiliary RFA …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another animal study, the long-term effects of endobiliary RFA included the development of segmental stricture with cholangitis, but neither bleeding nor perforation was observed during the 28 days after endobiliary RFA. 12 Our study was performed to evaluate the safety of temperaturecontrolled endobiliary RFA using the new RF catheter, before a prospective, controlled, comparative clinical study is conducted. There were no adverse events that suggested significant injury of the vessels or the bile duct.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Intraductal RFA with an endobiliary catheter (Habib EndoHPB; EMcision, London, UK) has been designed to potentially improve the stent patency and survival rates [11,12]. However, because of heat sink and thermal injury, its clinical use was confined by the risk of treatment-related complications and limited efficacy [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%