2021
DOI: 10.1055/a-1690-8728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Risk of Major Bleeding after Discontinuing Anticoagulation for Unprovoked Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract: Background: The long-term risk of major bleeding after discontinuing anticoagulant therapy for a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) is uncertain. Objectives: To determine the incidence of major bleeding up to 5 years after discontinuing anticoagulation for a first unprovoked VTE. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL (from inception to January 2021) to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies reporting major bleeding after disconti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The annual rate of major bleeding after stopping anticoagulant therapy will be defined as 0.4% per year based on a recent a systematic review and meta-analysis of 8740 patients with a first unprovoked VTE that had completed at least 3 months of initial anticoagulant treatment. 25 The annual rate of major bleeding during extended anticoagulant therapy will be defined as 1.1% per year based on a recent systematic review and meta-analysis of 7220 patients with a first unprovoked VTE that had completed at least 3 months of initial anticoagulant treatment and received extended anticoagulation of up to 1 year with a DOAC. 26 Based on input from clinical experts, for the base case, patients assigned to the ‘indefinite anticoagulation’ arm that experience a major bleeding event at any point will temporarily interrupt anticoagulation (for 2 weeks), 4 and then restart treatment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The annual rate of major bleeding after stopping anticoagulant therapy will be defined as 0.4% per year based on a recent a systematic review and meta-analysis of 8740 patients with a first unprovoked VTE that had completed at least 3 months of initial anticoagulant treatment. 25 The annual rate of major bleeding during extended anticoagulant therapy will be defined as 1.1% per year based on a recent systematic review and meta-analysis of 7220 patients with a first unprovoked VTE that had completed at least 3 months of initial anticoagulant treatment and received extended anticoagulation of up to 1 year with a DOAC. 26 Based on input from clinical experts, for the base case, patients assigned to the ‘indefinite anticoagulation’ arm that experience a major bleeding event at any point will temporarily interrupt anticoagulation (for 2 weeks), 4 and then restart treatment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major guidelines that focus on the management of VTE risk or on the clinical management of patients with ICH generally provide weak recommendation with an overall low quality of evidence. [4][5][6][7][8][9] This is despite the intense interest into understanding the risk factors for bleeding (especially in high-risk patient groups, [10][11][12] the long-term risks of bleeding after discontinuing anticoagulation therapy, 13 and improved efforts at bleeding risk stratification and balancing the riskbenefits of reintroducing anticoagulation after a major bleeding event). 14,15 In this issue of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Chi and colleagues present a systematic review of the association between pharmacological thromboprophylaxis with LMWH or UFH and the risk of VTE in patients with ICH.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%