2015
DOI: 10.5194/bg-12-921-2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term spatial and temporal variation of CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure in the Yellow River, China

Abstract: Abstract. Carbon transport in river systems is an important component of the global carbon cycle. Most rivers of the world act as atmospheric CO2 sources due to high riverine CO2 partial pressure (pCO2). By determining the pCO2 from alkalinity and pH, we investigated its spatial and temporal variation in the Yellow River watershed using historical water chemistry records (1950s–1984) and recent sampling along the mainstem (2011–2012). Except the headwater region where the pCO2 was lower than the atmospheric eq… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
90
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
6
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The annual DIC flux of the Mekong was 3.95 Tg, with DIC and alkalinity both negatively correlated with discharge (J. Richey, unpublished data). This trend, which has also been observed in the Pearl and Yellow River (Ran et al, 2015a), has been attributed to the dominance of a weathering-based source in the dry season which is diluted by less ion-rich source (rainwater) during the high-flow periods (Cai et al, 2008). The mean of reported values for the lower Mekong River is 1235 415 atm (Table 3).…”
Section: Effects Of Increasing Water Pollution In Asian River Systemsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The annual DIC flux of the Mekong was 3.95 Tg, with DIC and alkalinity both negatively correlated with discharge (J. Richey, unpublished data). This trend, which has also been observed in the Pearl and Yellow River (Ran et al, 2015a), has been attributed to the dominance of a weathering-based source in the dry season which is diluted by less ion-rich source (rainwater) during the high-flow periods (Cai et al, 2008). The mean of reported values for the lower Mekong River is 1235 415 atm (Table 3).…”
Section: Effects Of Increasing Water Pollution In Asian River Systemsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…3), the organic C in highly turbid waters of many Asian rivers can become an important source of CO2 during the fluvial transport and sediment storage. Although the rate of CO2 evasion from the water surface can increase in the impounded river reaches as longer residence times tend to create favourable environments for microbial biodegradation of organic C (Ittekkot et al, 270 1985;Ran et al, 2015a), the countering effect of enhanced planktonic uptake of CO2 in the euphotic reservoir surface has rarely been compared against biodegradation (refer to the wide range of pCO2 summarized in Table 3). Based on extensive CO2 evasion measurements in the river-reservoir-river continuum on the Loess Plateau, Ran et al (2017a) found that the Loess Plateau reservoirs acted as relatively small sources or even sinks of C, due largely to the significantly reduced turbulence and enhanced photosynthesis.…”
Section: Effects Of River Impoundmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2). Very high levels of pCO 2 observed in the lower reach of the Han River (up to 4132 atm) and its three 290 urban tributaries (up to 11970 atm) fall in the high ranges found in some polluted rivers in Europe (Kempe, 1984;Frankignoulle et al, 1998;Borges et al, 2006) and China (Yao et al, 2007;Ran et al, 2015;Liu et al, 2016;. Consistent with these previous reports on pCO 2 and other studies reporting high levels of CH 4 and N 2 O in polluted urban waters (Garnier et al, 2013;Yu et al, 2013;Smith et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2017bWang et al, , 2018, the results observed in this study emphasize the dominant influence of urban tributaries carrying wastewater as a primary anthropogenic source of GHGs 295 in the highly urbanized river system.…”
Section: Reach-specific Patterns and Controls On Three Ghgsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be 20 mentioned that the DIC concentration may be underestimated due to CO 2 outgassing during leachate collection. However, the potential underestimation is lower than 7% owing to the low proportion of outgassed CO 2 in total DIC (Table S2) as calculated using formulas in Ran et al (2015). CO 2 concentration in the soil column headspace was determined by gas chromatograph (Agilent 7890A, USA) coupled with a flame ionization detector (FID).…”
Section: Sample Analyses 10mentioning
confidence: 99%