1997
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-63623-4_55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term spatial representations from pictorial and textual input

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, spatial representations derived from language do not seem to be as vivid as ones derived from perception. For example, Federico and Franklin (1997) found that information about spatial relations was retained longer in memory when it was encoded from pictures rather than text. Finally, the studies by Mellet et al (2000Mellet et al ( , 2002 revealed that despite the common activation of the parieto-frontal network, language and vision activated (during mental scanning) other areas that were specific to the input; language selectively activated the angular gyrus and Broca's and Wernicke's areas (Mellet et al, 2002), whereas vision selectively activated the medial temporal lobe (Mellet et al, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, spatial representations derived from language do not seem to be as vivid as ones derived from perception. For example, Federico and Franklin (1997) found that information about spatial relations was retained longer in memory when it was encoded from pictures rather than text. Finally, the studies by Mellet et al (2000Mellet et al ( , 2002 revealed that despite the common activation of the parieto-frontal network, language and vision activated (during mental scanning) other areas that were specific to the input; language selectively activated the angular gyrus and Broca's and Wernicke's areas (Mellet et al, 2002), whereas vision selectively activated the medial temporal lobe (Mellet et al, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, spatial representations constructed by means of language do not seem as vivid as ones derived from vision, and the latter appear to be retained longer in memory (e.g. Federico & Franklin, ). Klatzky et al () showed that when spatial information was learned by means of language, participants took longer to form a stable spatial representation of the environment than when a direct perception of the stimuli was provided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%