2016
DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acw055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term Stability and Reliability of Baseline Cognitive Assessments in High School Athletes Using ImPACT at 1-, 2-, and 3-year Test–Retest Intervals

Abstract: The results suggest ImPACT composites scores remain considerably stability across 1-, 2-, and 3-year test-retest intervals in high school athletes, when considering both ICCs and RBM. Annually ascertaining baseline scores continues to be optimal for ensuring accurate and individualized management of injury for concussed athletes. For instances in which more recent baselines are not available (1-2 years), clinicians should seek to utilize more conservative range estimates in determining the presence of clinical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned above, the reliability of the KINARM tasks utilized here was similar to other assessment tools currently being used to assess SRC-related deficits, such as ImPACT neurocognitive testing [ 9 , 33 35 ], SOT posturography [ 38 ], and symptom reporting [ 39 ]. Given that SRC is a diffuse injury with many potential overlapping pathologies, it is not always clear what to look for (e.g., many different signs/symptoms, cognitive impairment, sensorimotor deficits, balance impairment, vestibular features, oculomotor deficits, cervicogenic features, autonomic nervous system dysfunction).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As mentioned above, the reliability of the KINARM tasks utilized here was similar to other assessment tools currently being used to assess SRC-related deficits, such as ImPACT neurocognitive testing [ 9 , 33 35 ], SOT posturography [ 38 ], and symptom reporting [ 39 ]. Given that SRC is a diffuse injury with many potential overlapping pathologies, it is not always clear what to look for (e.g., many different signs/symptoms, cognitive impairment, sensorimotor deficits, balance impairment, vestibular features, oculomotor deficits, cervicogenic features, autonomic nervous system dysfunction).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The test-retest reliability of the subset of KINARM Standard Tests studied presently appears comparable to other assessment tools currently being used to evaluate SRC in clinical and research settings. For example, investigation of test-retest reliability of computerized neurocognitive tests, such as the ImPACT, in athletes has yielded results suggesting a range from very poor to very good reliability [ 9 , 33 35 ]. A study of young healthy individuals completing the Sensory Organization Test of Computerized Dynamic Posturography (SOT), a test commonly used to evaluate postural stability in SRC research [ 36 , 37 ], determined an ICC of 0.64 for its composite score and ICCs ranging from 0.43 to 0.79 for the scores derived for each of the six SOT conditions [ 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An evidence-based definition of recovery from concussion is important given the risk of more severe consequences should repeat injury occur before resolution of the first concussion 15 and increased awareness of possible long-term effects of concussion. 16 The test-retest reliability and internal consistency of Immediate Post-concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT), 17 the Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test (BCTT), 18 and the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) 19 have been reported on but not for other measures. The international consensus meetings on concussion in sport 67 has stated that a single criterion may not be sufficient to define concussion recovery; hence, we included only research articles that used at least two measures to define recovery from sport-related concussion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with no further testing after their initial baseline test were considered lost to follow-up. 5,6,42 In accordance with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines, participants lost to follow-up contributed 1 person-year. 8 To estimate the severity of each head trauma and/or concussion, we calculated the previously published SI.…”
Section: Concussion Composite Scores and Symptom Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%