Long-Term Stability of Soft Tissues Following Alveolar Ridge Preservation: 10-Year Results of a Prospective Study Around Nonsubmerged Implants

Roccuzzo, Mario; Gaudioso, Luigi; Bunino, Marco; Dalmasso, Paola

doi:10.11607/prd.2133

Cited by 34 publications

(52 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, it can be expected that eventual bone‐to‐implant contact percentages would reach similar levels in both the ARP site and the naturally healed site (Thoma et al, ). Recent long‐term studies exhibiting high survival rates of implants placed in ARP sites appear to support this (Apostolopoulos & Darby, ; Roccuzzo, Gaudioso, Bunino, & Dalmasso, ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 83%

Ridge preservation in molar extraction sites with an open‐healing approach: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Lim

Shin

Cho

et al. 2019

J Clinic Periodontology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim To determine the effect of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) in molar sites without primary flap closure. Materials and Methods Three groups were established: extraction sockets grafted with deproteinized bovine bone mineral containing 10% collagen (DBBM‐C) and covered by a native bilayer collagen membrane (NBCM) (test group 1), sockets grafted with DBBM‐C only (test group 2), and sockets that healed naturally (control group). Primary flap closure was not attempted. Conebeam computed tomography scans were obtained immediately and then 4 months after ARP. A biopsy was performed. The change of the marginal bone level was measured. Results There was significantly less horizontal resorption in test group 1 than in the control group at levels 1 mm (−1.02 ± 0.88 [mean ± SD] vs. −4.44 ± 3.71 mm) and 3 mm (−0.31 ± 1.51 vs. −2.27 ± 1.15 mm) below the crest, and significantly less vertical reduction in the midcrestal area in test group 1 than in test group 2 (−0.25 ± 0.95 vs. −1.15 ± 1.63 mm) (p < .05). There were no significant differences between test groups in clinical and histomorphometric measurements. All groups exhibited stable marginal bone levels after 1 year of loading. Conclusion Alveolar ridge preservation without primary flap closure in molar areas was effective in minimizing ridge resorption and facilitated implant treatment.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 83%

Ridge preservation in molar extraction sites with an open‐healing approach: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Lim

Shin

Cho

et al. 2019

J Clinic Periodontology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Moreover, the spongy consistency of DBBMC, due to the collagen coating, after moistening in sterile saline, allowed easy adaptation and physical stabilization of the material even in non‐containing defects, particularly important in the absence of a real GBR procedure (Roccuzzo et al. ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Surgical therapy of single peri‐implantitis intrabony defects, by means of deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen

Roccuzzo

Gaudioso²,

Lungo³

et al. 2016

J Clinic Periodontology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

These results confirm the possibility to successfully treat peri-implantitis lesions. There is lack of evidence of whether or not the resolution of the peri-implant disease is associated with the defect configuration. Due to the fact that complete resolution does not seem a predictable outcome, the clinical decision on whether implants should be treated should be based on several patient related elements.

show abstract

“…Positive histological and clinical outcomes for DBBM in ridge preservation have also been reported in other studies . A recent study demonstrated good long‐term stability of peri‐implant marginal soft tissues over 10 years when patients were properly monitored . Although, in this analysis both materials provided positive clinical results, further research should be performed to evaluate the suitability of different bone substitutes in ridge preservation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Clinical Effectiveness of Alveolar Ridge Preservation in the Maxillary Anterior Esthetic Zone—A Retrospective Study

Lee

Poon

2017

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Long-Term Stability of Soft Tissues Following Alveolar Ridge Preservation: 10-Year Results of a Prospective Study Around Nonsubmerged Implants

Cited by 34 publications

References 0 publications

Ridge preservation in molar extraction sites with an open‐healing approach: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Ridge preservation in molar extraction sites with an open‐healing approach: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Surgical therapy of single peri‐implantitis intrabony defects, by means of deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen

The Clinical Effectiveness of Alveolar Ridge Preservation in the Maxillary Anterior Esthetic Zone—A Retrospective Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About