2004
DOI: 10.1002/jps.20010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long‐term stability study of L‐adrenaline injections: Kinetics of sulfonation and racemization pathways of drug degradation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…L-adrenaline in the solution is subject to degradation during long-term storage, caused by oxidation, sulfonation, and racemization. Products of these reactions, including D-adrenaline and adrenaline sulfonate, do not have pharmacological activity comparable to L-adrenaline [41]. Therefore, the test results c test of L-adrenaline concentration in the stored product (relative to the labeled amount) were compared with the lower specification limit c l.s.l = 90.0 %.…”
Section: Example 3 Oos Test Results In Long-term Stability Study Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L-adrenaline in the solution is subject to degradation during long-term storage, caused by oxidation, sulfonation, and racemization. Products of these reactions, including D-adrenaline and adrenaline sulfonate, do not have pharmacological activity comparable to L-adrenaline [41]. Therefore, the test results c test of L-adrenaline concentration in the stored product (relative to the labeled amount) were compared with the lower specification limit c l.s.l = 90.0 %.…”
Section: Example 3 Oos Test Results In Long-term Stability Study Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the number of degradant peaks is the same in both separations, and if the are percent of the main component is the same in both separations, then there can be reasonable confidenc that all the degradants have been resolved from the main component. Automated versions of this approach have been successfully utilized in a multidimensional screening with instrumentation capable of systematically evaluating several different columns and eluents for impurity analysis [27][28][29] .…”
Section: Figure 1: Normalised Signals For Pure and Impure Peakmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to ICH guidelines, the content of D-forms must not be higher than from 0.1 to 1.0%, depending on the amount of drug substance administered per day (http://www.ich.org/cache/compo/ 276-2541.html, checked on December 2008) [13]. Moreover, L-enantiomers in solution can be partially or completely racemized during long storage [14,15]. As a result, it is important to know the enantiomeric purity of EP or NEP in pharmaceutical formulations for adequate usage, being the optical rotation method often adopted for this purpose, although it is sometimes not applicable on account of low sensitivity [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%