2013
DOI: 10.1155/2013/851987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Station Blackout Accident Analyses of a PWR with RELAP5/MOD3.3

Abstract: Stress tests performed in Europe after accident at Fukushima Daiichi also required evaluation of the consequences of loss of safety functions due to station blackout (SBO). Long-term SBO in a pressurized water reactor (PWR) leads to severe accident sequences, assuming that existing plant means (systems, equipment, and procedures) are used for accident mitigation. Therefore the main objective was to study the accident management strategies for SBO scenarios (with different reactor coolant pumps (RCPs) leaks ass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A problem of interest in the nuclear power industry involves the response of PWR pressure boundary components under SBO conditions [2]. SBO scenario involves a loss of off-site power, failure of the emergency diesel generators, failure of alternate current (AC) power and the eventual degradation of the reactor coolant pump (RCP) seals under the temperature effect and creep rupture in the surge line resulting in a long-term loss of coolant [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A problem of interest in the nuclear power industry involves the response of PWR pressure boundary components under SBO conditions [2]. SBO scenario involves a loss of off-site power, failure of the emergency diesel generators, failure of alternate current (AC) power and the eventual degradation of the reactor coolant pump (RCP) seals under the temperature effect and creep rupture in the surge line resulting in a long-term loss of coolant [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, there are many examples of stationblackout analysis, using severe accident codes to simulate, during the first 24 h, scenarios leading to RCS damage [4]. Vierow et al have studied [3,4] a TMLB hypothetical scenario of station blackout with a loss of AC power and no recovery of auxiliary feedwater to the steam generators at a 4-loop Westinghouse pressurized water reactor based on Zion. In this study, the authors used MELCOR, MAAP4 and SCDAP/RELAP5 severe accident codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steam generator (SG) secondary-side depressurization through the SG valve(s) is one of major AM measures to cool and depressurize the primary system via natural circulation (NC) because of steam condensation in the SG U-tubes especially when high-pressure injection system of emergency core cooling system (ECCS) is totally failed during accidents and transients in a pressurized water reactor (PWR). Several studies [2][3][4][5][6] have been conducted to investigate thermal hydraulic responses in SBO scenarios with AM measures of PWRs by calculations with best-estimate computer codes. Some researchers [7,8] have analyzed loss of primary coolant and SBO events in PWRs employing severe accident computer codes, but under the condition modeling for the pressure vessel internals except the core and the downcomer was more simplified than that in the best-estimate computer codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies on the optimization of AM measures (e.g. primary-side and/or SG secondary-side depressurization) have been done for SBO scenarios through the long-term analyses of PWRs with best-estimate computer codes (Cherubini, et al, 2008;Tusheva, et al, 2012Tusheva, et al, , 2014Prošek and Cizelj, 2013). Some experimental data on PWR SBO scenarios with AM measures have been obtained by using such integral test facilities as the PSB-VVER in Russia (Bucalossi, et al, 2012) and the PKL in Germany (Umminger, et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%