1995
DOI: 10.1089/cbr.1995.10.195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term Subcutaneous Recombinant Interleukin-2 as Maintenance Therapy: Biological Effects and Clinical Implications

Abstract: Several trials have evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of rIL-2 combined with more traditional treatments such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy, but the use of IL-2 as adjuvant therapy for minimal residual disease or to maintain clinical response obtained with other standard treatments has yet to be investigated. The aim of the present trial was to study the biological effects of maintenance long-term treatment (6 months) with subcutaneous low-dose IL-2 in 16 patients with different neoplasms previously treate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kammula et al reviewed safety data of high-dose bolus rIL-2 (720,000 IU/kg every 8 h) administered in 1,241 cancer patients over a 12-year period and found a clear improvement in rIL-2 safety profile with a remarkable drop from 12% to 3% in the incidence of NCPE [32]. The feasibility and the safety of longterm administration of subcutaneous rIL-2 at conventional 155 Cancer-Therapy-Related Noncardiogenic Pulmonary Edema doses of 4.5 million IU/day, three times weekly, has been well established [33] while novel locoregional administration strategies, such as the inhalation of nebulized rIL-2, are being investigated with the aim of improving its therapeutic index [34]. The more favorable toxicity profile of subcutaneous, compared with intravenous, bolus administration of rIL-2, is possibly attributed to a lower systemic absorption (30% of the injected dose) and a better pharmacokinetic profile (sustained systemic exposure and lower peak levels) associated with this route [22].…”
Section: Biotherapeutic Agentsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kammula et al reviewed safety data of high-dose bolus rIL-2 (720,000 IU/kg every 8 h) administered in 1,241 cancer patients over a 12-year period and found a clear improvement in rIL-2 safety profile with a remarkable drop from 12% to 3% in the incidence of NCPE [32]. The feasibility and the safety of longterm administration of subcutaneous rIL-2 at conventional 155 Cancer-Therapy-Related Noncardiogenic Pulmonary Edema doses of 4.5 million IU/day, three times weekly, has been well established [33] while novel locoregional administration strategies, such as the inhalation of nebulized rIL-2, are being investigated with the aim of improving its therapeutic index [34]. The more favorable toxicity profile of subcutaneous, compared with intravenous, bolus administration of rIL-2, is possibly attributed to a lower systemic absorption (30% of the injected dose) and a better pharmacokinetic profile (sustained systemic exposure and lower peak levels) associated with this route [22].…”
Section: Biotherapeutic Agentsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Subsequent studies went into more detail and associated the systemic administration of rIL-2 with lesions of venous and capillary endothelia, alveolar basement membrane, and type I epithelial cells in animals, while leukocyte or platelet activation, generation of free radicals, and activation of the complement system have also been suggested to be involved in its pathogenesis [92][93][94][95][96][97]. Despite a widening evidence of the involvement of various cytokines released by activated lymphoid cells in the pathogenesis of rIL-2-induced NCPE, the exact mechanism of the damaging events that drive this clinical syndrome remain unclear [23,33]. Recent demonstration of functional IL-2 receptors on type II pneumocytes indicates that these cells may also Briasoulis,Pavlidis 158 become involved in the pathogenesis of rIL-2-induced NCPE [98].…”
Section: Pathophysiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of patients varied from 2 to 21. Immunological effect due to IL-2 (immunocompetent cells stimulation) occurred in all of these studies, however no important clinical effect was observed [64,[66][67][68][69][70][71].…”
Section: Interleukin-2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study confirmed the prognostic negative impact of sIL-2R in MM patients. Data regarding the behaviour of cytokines during IL-2-based treatments are very few [42,43]. In our 37 evaluated patients, a progressive increase of IL-12 and sIL-2R was observed in those patients with a better survival (more than 1 year) compared with those patients with a worse survival, who presented virtually unchanged levels of IL-12 and strongly decreased sIL-2R levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%