2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term survival among OHCA patients who survive to 30 days: Does initial arrest rhythm remain a prognostic determinant?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in our paper we went further, analyzing not only the all EMS-treated OHCAs, but also all the different Utstein subgroups of OHCA patients. We indeed unexpectedly highlighted that the SMR is higher than the general population in those patients with more favorable OHCA characteristics, represented by the Utstein comparator group (shockable bystander witnessed) and the “shockable bystander CPR.” Our results are also in line with another recent Australian paper ( 35 ), which showed that patients with non-shockable arrests continued to experience disproportionately higher mortality than patients with an initial shockable arrest in long-term follow-up. Our results, taking into account other variables as suggested by Utstein categories and comparing the mortality risk to the general population, provide new useful information for the long-term management of surviving patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in our paper we went further, analyzing not only the all EMS-treated OHCAs, but also all the different Utstein subgroups of OHCA patients. We indeed unexpectedly highlighted that the SMR is higher than the general population in those patients with more favorable OHCA characteristics, represented by the Utstein comparator group (shockable bystander witnessed) and the “shockable bystander CPR.” Our results are also in line with another recent Australian paper ( 35 ), which showed that patients with non-shockable arrests continued to experience disproportionately higher mortality than patients with an initial shockable arrest in long-term follow-up. Our results, taking into account other variables as suggested by Utstein categories and comparing the mortality risk to the general population, provide new useful information for the long-term management of surviving patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our study, which includes all the OHCA cases that occurred in four provinces and were filed according to the Utstein style recommendations, should overcome selection bias. This is similar to four studies carried out in Israel ( 31 ), Canada ( 32 ), and Australia ( 33 35 ). Marcus et al ( 31 ) looked for differences in both survival and survival with good neurological outcome between patients aged over and under 80 years.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio fact that only patients with a shockable rhythm were eligible for the COACT trial which is associated with improved survival in OHCA. 11,12 The occurrence of bleeding and renal replacement therapy was not different between the treatment arms; hence no safety concerns were noted for the early invasive approach with regard to these endpoints. The need for renal replacement therapy due to acute renal failure was lower in the COACT study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Of note, mortality differed noticeably between the large trials COACT and TOMAHAWK. This can probably be attributed to the fact that only patients with a shockable rhythm were eligible for the COACT trial which is associated with improved survival in OHCA 11,12 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C. Shockable rhythm is a strong predictor associated with a presumed cardiac cause. Particularly, a good prognosis can be expected if the initial electrocardiogram is a shockable rhythm [18,19]. Even in an elderly patient group, shockable rhythm is a major prognostic factor [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%