1991
DOI: 10.1016/0277-5379(91)90011-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term survival in ovarian cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
4

Year Published

1993
1993
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
34
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…24 Interestingly, we observed that in patients inoperable at first surgery (these patients underwent succesful IDS) and therefore endowed with a poor prognosis 25,26 the 5-year OS rate (54%) and the median OS (75 months) seem Days to: WBC Ͼ1 ϫ 10 9 /l 10.6 Ϯ 0.9 8.7 Ϯ 0.7 9.8 Ϯ 0. to be higher than those (5-year OS ranging from 22% to 35% with a median OS of 25 months) seen with standard chemotherapy. 25,26 Available data on HDC in patients cytoreduced at the time of IDS are scanty and mostly uninterpretable; 3,8,17 nevertheless, our data are in good keeping with the results reported by Legros et al, 8 and suggest that ovarian cancer patients with inoperable disease at diagnosis may still benefit from HDC if tumors are chemosensitive and optimal debulking can be performed by IDS. In this patient subset the extent of benefit seems even greater than in patients optimally cytoreduced at first surgery, although the very wide range of confidence intervals does not allow any definitive conclusions to be drawn.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…24 Interestingly, we observed that in patients inoperable at first surgery (these patients underwent succesful IDS) and therefore endowed with a poor prognosis 25,26 the 5-year OS rate (54%) and the median OS (75 months) seem Days to: WBC Ͼ1 ϫ 10 9 /l 10.6 Ϯ 0.9 8.7 Ϯ 0.7 9.8 Ϯ 0. to be higher than those (5-year OS ranging from 22% to 35% with a median OS of 25 months) seen with standard chemotherapy. 25,26 Available data on HDC in patients cytoreduced at the time of IDS are scanty and mostly uninterpretable; 3,8,17 nevertheless, our data are in good keeping with the results reported by Legros et al, 8 and suggest that ovarian cancer patients with inoperable disease at diagnosis may still benefit from HDC if tumors are chemosensitive and optimal debulking can be performed by IDS. In this patient subset the extent of benefit seems even greater than in patients optimally cytoreduced at first surgery, although the very wide range of confidence intervals does not allow any definitive conclusions to be drawn.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Despite the established role of platinum-based combination chemotherapy in the treatment of ovarian cancer, resulting in prolonged disease-free survival even in patients with overt metastatic disease, unfortunately the majority of patients eventually will relapse (Neijt et al, 1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been debated whether the distinction between complete pathologic response and microscopic disease has a clinical relevance (16). In an early analysis of patients included in the Dutch ovarian cancer study group, Nejt et al (31) found that patients with microscopic disease had a survival similar to that of patients with complete pathological response. However, a long-term survival analysis of the Dutch study showed that the proportion of patients with complete pathologic response was 6O%, compared with 25% for patients with microscopic disease (31).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%