2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.08.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term treatment response to continuous cycling course in bipolar disorders: A meta-analysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We Within the context of those substantial differences, it is worth noting that the proportions of WMH respondents who reported being helped were higher than the proportion of bipolar patients found to have good long-term treatment response in observational studies of treatment samples, 34 possibly suggesting that patients in the community have a broader definition of helpfulness than the definitions used in clinical studies. We also found less consistent evidence for significant predictors of patient-reported helpfulness than in the clinical literature on predictors of treatment response, [35][36][37] suggesting that the determinants of patient perceptions of treatment helpfulness might be different from the determinants of clinical definitions of treatment success.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We Within the context of those substantial differences, it is worth noting that the proportions of WMH respondents who reported being helped were higher than the proportion of bipolar patients found to have good long-term treatment response in observational studies of treatment samples, 34 possibly suggesting that patients in the community have a broader definition of helpfulness than the definitions used in clinical studies. We also found less consistent evidence for significant predictors of patient-reported helpfulness than in the clinical literature on predictors of treatment response, [35][36][37] suggesting that the determinants of patient perceptions of treatment helpfulness might be different from the determinants of clinical definitions of treatment success.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Several reviews of the subject exist in the current literature. These include narrative reviews[ 4 , 24 , 27 , 30 , 32 ], systematic reviews[ 6 , 16 , 17 , 29 , 31 ], and meta-analyses[ 5 , 18 , 20 , 21 , 33 ] ( includes a complete list of all the reviews consulted).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, patients with psychiatric comorbidities such as SUDs are often excluded. Moreover, a substantial proportion of BD patients show inadequate response to medication ( 18 ). Medication patterns in community BD samples and naturalistic settings often diverge from guidelines, increasing the risk of poor clinical outcome ( 19 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%