2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term trends of surface ozone in Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These features suggest that cases of high O 3 pollution have significantly contributed to the deterioration of urban air quality in South Korea, and this situation is not simply related to the level of other air pollutants or the scale of megacities. While the O 3 increase in the whole Korean peninsula has been reported (Yoo et al, 2015;Yeo and Kim, 2021), the main influencing factor is still not understood clearly. There were some trials to explain the O 3 increase in South Korea based on the meteorological effect (Seo et al, 2014), land use pattern (Yoo et al, 2015), and local emission effect (Shin et al, 2012;Yeo and Kim, 2021).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These features suggest that cases of high O 3 pollution have significantly contributed to the deterioration of urban air quality in South Korea, and this situation is not simply related to the level of other air pollutants or the scale of megacities. While the O 3 increase in the whole Korean peninsula has been reported (Yoo et al, 2015;Yeo and Kim, 2021), the main influencing factor is still not understood clearly. There were some trials to explain the O 3 increase in South Korea based on the meteorological effect (Seo et al, 2014), land use pattern (Yoo et al, 2015), and local emission effect (Shin et al, 2012;Yeo and Kim, 2021).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the O 3 increase in the whole Korean peninsula has been reported (Yoo et al, 2015;Yeo and Kim, 2021), the main influencing factor is still not understood clearly. There were some trials to explain the O 3 increase in South Korea based on the meteorological effect (Seo et al, 2014), land use pattern (Yoo et al, 2015), and local emission effect (Shin et al, 2012;Yeo and Kim, 2021). The contribution of transboundary transport was also discussed (Oh et al, 2010;Choi et al, 2014).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gaudel et al (2018) reported rapidly increasing ozone trends from 2000 to 2014 in South Korea contrasting decreasing trends in North America and Europe utilizing available data from surface monitors, ozonesondes, and aircraft observations. Other studies also reported increasing ozone trends in South Korea for 2001-2018 (Lee et al, 2014;Shin et al, 2017;Lee et al, 2020;Yeo and Kim, 2021). Ozone in South Korea can be affected by ozone and its precursor in China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Surface ozone is a severe air quality problem in South Korea and has become steadily worse over the past two decades (Yeo and Kim, 2021;Kim et al, 2021). Ozone often exceeds 90 ppb in the Seoul Metropolitan Area (SMA) where 50% of South Korea's population is located (Miyazaki et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introduction 40mentioning
confidence: 99%