1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)62161-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long Term Use of Megestrol Acetate by Cancer Survivors for the Treatment of Hot Flashes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reasons for interruption of treatment were skin rashes, dyspnea, gastric pain, and increased arterial blood pressure. More clinical studies showed that depomedroxyprogesterone acetate and medroxyprogesterone acetate are effective in the treatment of hot flashes [71][72][73][74].…”
Section: Progestagensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reasons for interruption of treatment were skin rashes, dyspnea, gastric pain, and increased arterial blood pressure. More clinical studies showed that depomedroxyprogesterone acetate and medroxyprogesterone acetate are effective in the treatment of hot flashes [71][72][73][74].…”
Section: Progestagensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This concern has broader implications because of the common use of MA to block hot flashes in men on androgen-deprivation therapy. 46 Observation of these patients for an apparent flare in disease after the initiation of MA for these indications seems prudent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on lipid profiles in women using a LNG-IUS in conjunction with systemic oestrogen are reassuring and overall show a neutral profile. 3 Insertion of a LNG-IUS in a menopausal woman can be technically difficult, and smaller devices are in development. Wollter-Svenson et al studied over 100 women who were randomised to receive a smaller LNG-IUS releasing either 5 or 10 m g levonorgestrel per 24 hours in conjunction with systemic oestrogen.…”
Section: Martin K Oehler Nuffield Dept Of Obstetrics and Gynaecologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Low-dose progestogens and tibolone appear to confer significant symptom control but long-term controlled data on their efficacy and safety in breast cancer survivors are lacking. 3,4 The most recent and comprehensive re-analysis of observational HRT studies reported an increase in breast cancer risk with long-term exposure (calculated relative risk for a median duration of use of 11 years 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.21-1.49). In absolute terms, this probably accounts for only two extra cancers per 1,000 women who use HRT for five years.…”
Section: Martin K Oehler Nuffield Dept Of Obstetrics and Gynaecologymentioning
confidence: 99%