2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2004.11.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-time low-impact ball milling of multi-wall carbon nanotubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
55
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
7
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this to be the case, the distributions need to have a large positive skewness γ (larger than, say, 2), or, equivalently, a large scaled variance s. Clearly, this coupling between the skewness and the spread is not present for a distribution with more than two independent moments, but in the discussion below we show that a large value of s does actually imply a large skewness and that a large variance without any skewness is not sufficient to obtain a low PT. In any event, for those few CNT systems for which the moments of the length distributions have actually been determined, the skewness and spread seem to be quite small, i.e., γ = 0.40 and s = 0.20, giving φ p (x)/φ p (x 0 ) = 0.84, 40 or φ p (x)/φ p (x 0 ) = 0.64, 48 or φ p (x)/φ p (x 0 ) = 0.50 for an exponential distribution; 43,44 so for these the effect of polydispersity is modest. Given the very large scatter in measured PTs of carbon-nanotube composites, 17 we conclude that the skewness in the distributions must usually, in fact, be much larger than this.…”
Section: Realistic Size Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this to be the case, the distributions need to have a large positive skewness γ (larger than, say, 2), or, equivalently, a large scaled variance s. Clearly, this coupling between the skewness and the spread is not present for a distribution with more than two independent moments, but in the discussion below we show that a large value of s does actually imply a large skewness and that a large variance without any skewness is not sufficient to obtain a low PT. In any event, for those few CNT systems for which the moments of the length distributions have actually been determined, the skewness and spread seem to be quite small, i.e., γ = 0.40 and s = 0.20, giving φ p (x)/φ p (x 0 ) = 0.84, 40 or φ p (x)/φ p (x 0 ) = 0.64, 48 or φ p (x)/φ p (x 0 ) = 0.50 for an exponential distribution; 43,44 so for these the effect of polydispersity is modest. Given the very large scatter in measured PTs of carbon-nanotube composites, 17 we conclude that the skewness in the distributions must usually, in fact, be much larger than this.…”
Section: Realistic Size Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ball milling has been frequently used to cut short carbon nanotubes (CNT) by breaking C-C bonds. 15,16 For graphite, the stacked parallel graphene layers tend to slip apart upon milling because of weak van der Waals forces between them. A wet ball milling method was recently employed to exfoliate graphite to form graphene.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Various forms of ball-milling, also referred to as mechanical alloying (MA) or mechanical mixing, have been utilized to disperse nanometer-and micrometer-sized reinforcement agents, including CNTs, in MMCs, as the process allows for thorough mixing at relatively low temperatures. At the same time, it is well known that milling under improper conditions can also damage the CNT [19][20][21] or lead to carbide formations. 22 Even if temperatures remain low during milling, the induced residual strain and defects in the material enhance the likelihood for chemical reactions to occur during the following powder consolidation steps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%