2018
DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv.7504313
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long Time-Scale Atomistic Simulations of the Structure and Dynamics of Transcription Factor-DNA Recognition

Abstract: p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px 'Helvetica Neue'} <p>Recent years have witnessed an explosion of interest in computational studies of DNA binding proteins, including both coarse grained and atomistic simulations of transcription factor-DNA recognition, in order to understand how these transcription factors recognize their binding sites on the DNA with such exquisite specificity. The present study performs μs-timescale all-atom simulations of the dimeric f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Curiously, however, MarA interacts with the DNA with at both the A-box and the B-box, whereas Rob only interacts with the DNA at the A-box (Figure 1), without significantly compromising the binding affinity of DNA to Rob (Table S2) (23). We hypothesize that these two very different DNA binding modes result from differential dynamics at the binding interface, as such dynamics has been suggested to be important in other systems (11,34,68). These can result from differences in the intrinsic flexibility of the two proteins, sequence-specific differences in the intrinsic flexibility of the DNA, or differences in both protein and DNA simultaneously.…”
Section: Exploring the Intrinsic Flexibility Of Mara Rob And The Dna Sequences Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Curiously, however, MarA interacts with the DNA with at both the A-box and the B-box, whereas Rob only interacts with the DNA at the A-box (Figure 1), without significantly compromising the binding affinity of DNA to Rob (Table S2) (23). We hypothesize that these two very different DNA binding modes result from differential dynamics at the binding interface, as such dynamics has been suggested to be important in other systems (11,34,68). These can result from differences in the intrinsic flexibility of the two proteins, sequence-specific differences in the intrinsic flexibility of the DNA, or differences in both protein and DNA simultaneously.…”
Section: Exploring the Intrinsic Flexibility Of Mara Rob And The Dna Sequences Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This is supported by a substantial history of MD simulation of protein-DNA binding (34), allostery (35), effect of ions (36), and contact dynamics (37). We recently performed multimicrosecond all-atom simulations of LacI-DNA interactions, exploring the interactions between LacI and both specific and non-specific DNA sequences (11). These simulations suggested, in agreement with experimental observations (38), that stable LacI binding occurs primarily to bent A-form DNA and helped explain the molecular interactions contributing to specific binding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, structure-based simulations allow for molecular dynamics (MD) characterization of key structure components of the systems. Atomic MD simulations contain finest structural dynamics details but are often limited by simulation time scale, which can hardly surpass several microseconds for a TF protein-DNA system of a regular size [18][19][20]. Coarse-graining (CG) techniques, however, provide ways to extend the simulation time scale via maintaining essential protein-DNA electrostatic interactions to support the TF diffusion [21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%