“…The simplest detectors such as electrochemical (Liu and Lin, 2005), colorimetric (Davidson et al, 2020) and fluorimetric sensors (Khan et al, 2018;Meng et al, 2021), surface acoustic wave detectors (Kim et al, 2020) and ion-mobility spectrometers (Puton and Namieśnik, 2016) provide a low-cost option for screening, but they suffer from poor sensitivity, insufficient selectivity and/or susceptibility to changes in temperature and humidity. Technologies with improved performance include gas chromatography mass spectrometry (Smith et al, 2004), Raman spectroscopy (Lafuente et al, 2020) and infrared absorption spectroscopy (Pushkarsky et al, 2006;Mukherjee et al, 2008;Gurton et al, 2012;Levy, 2009;Sharpe et al, 2003;Ruiz-Pesante et al, 2007;Ohrui et al, 2020;Melkonian et al, 2020), which are preferred in different scenarios due to their specific characteristics. Infrared absorption spectroscopy is typically well suited for rapid identification of volatile NAs in ambient air, techniques ranging from extremely sensitive photoacoustic spectroscopy (PAS) (Pushkarsky et al, 2006;Mukherjee et al, 2008;Gurton et al, 2012) to Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) (Sharpe et al, 2003;Ruiz-Pesante et al, 2007;Ohrui et al, 2020) capable of selective multi-species detection.…”