2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2003.14143
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longest paths in random hypergraphs

Abstract: Given integers k, j with 1 ≤ j ≤ k − 1, we consider the length of the longest j-tight path in the binomial random k-uniform hypergraph H k (n, p). We show that this length undergoes a phase transition from logarithmic length to linear and determine the critical threshold, as well as proving upper and lower bounds on the length in the subcritical and supercritical ranges.In particular, for the supercritical case we introduce the Pathfinder algorithm, a depth-first search algorithm which discovers j-tight paths … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that it is trivially true that L P ≥ L C − O (1), where L P denotes the length of the longest j-tight path in H k (n, p). Therefore as a corollary we also obtain a lower bound on L P which generalises the one in [3].…”
Section: Sprinkling In Hypergraphssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Note that it is trivially true that L P ≥ L C − O (1), where L P denotes the length of the longest j-tight path in H k (n, p). Therefore as a corollary we also obtain a lower bound on L P which generalises the one in [3].…”
Section: Sprinkling In Hypergraphssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Let H k (n, p) denote the k-uniform binomial random hypergraph, in which each k-set of vertices forms an edge with probability p independently. The analogue of the result of Ajtai, Komlós and Szemerédi showing a threshold for the existence of a j-tight path of linear length in H k (n, p) was proved by the author together with Garbe, Hng, Kang, Sanhueza-Matamala and Zalla [3] for all k and j. In contrast to the graph case, in general the threshold is not the same as the threshold for a giant j-tuple component (which was determined in [7]).…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations