Longevity of metal-ceramic single crowns cemented onto resin composite prosthetic cores with self-adhesive resin cement: an update of a prospective analysis with up to 106 months of follow-up

Machry, Renan Vaz; Bergoli, César Dalmolin; Schwantz, Julia Kaster; Brondani, Lucas Pradebon; Pereira‐Cenci, Tatiana; Pereira, Gabriel Kalil Rocha; Valandro, Luiz Felipe

doi:10.1007/s00784-022-04693-6

Cited by 2 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As it can be seen from the above‐mentioned, certain discrepancies may exist between laboratory and clinical trials, and the right choice of cement depends on the substrate and clinical situation. Overall, self‐adhesive cements seem to perform well in retentive restorations – full crowns and intraradicular fiber posts, 13,23,24 but could present certain shortcomings (reduced life‐span and esthetic‐related problems) when faced with less retentive types of preparations, such as partial crowns 5 or short abutments. For partial indirect restorations and in the presence of enamel as substrate, the use of self‐adhesive resin cements alone is not indicated, as they cannot guarantee optimal clinical outcome and durable retention 25,26 .…”

Section: Classification Of Resin‐based Cementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Resin composite cements: Current status and a novel classification proposal

Maravić

Mazzitelli

Mancuso

et al. 2023

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesCurrently, a classification of resin cements that includes relatively recently formulated (“universal”) cements is lacking. Furthermore, the terminology used to define different resin cements in the scientific reports is inconsistent. Accordingly, this work aims to: (i) propose a novel classification of resin composite cements; (ii) disambiguate the term “universal cements” and (iii) present an overview of the properties of these cements.MethodsAn analysis of peer‐reviewed literature (PubMed search), as well as market research on definitive resin composite cements were performed.ResultsA tendency toward simplified and versatile luting materials was observed both in the scientific literature and on the dental market with the advent of self‐adhesive/one‐step resin cements. However, additional priming procedures were necessary to improve their bonding performance in certain clinical situations. Hence, several cements that can be applied both in adhesive and self‐adhesive mode were introduced. These cements are associated with a universal adhesive resin, that can be used as a tooth and/or restorative material primer, without the need for other priming systems, regardless of the substrate. These systems should be considered truly universal. Therefore, we hereby suggested a new classification of resin‐based cements: (1) adhesive/multi‐step; (2) self‐adhesive/one‐step; (3) universal cements (one‐ or multi‐step). Despite promising in vitro results, clinical trials and long‐track laboratory studies are necessary to confirm the reliability of the universal cements.ConclusionsThis review presented the current advances in the field of resin‐based cements, which are reflected in the proposed classification. The term “universal cement” was disambiguated, which will help standardize the terminology used in published research.Clinical SignificanceThe classification of resin‐based cements and a better understanding of the proper terminology will help standardize the terminology in published research, as well as improve the understanding of the clinical practitioners of the different indications and possible modalities of use of the available cements.

show abstract

Section: Classification Of Resin‐based Cementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Resin composite cements: Current status and a novel classification proposal

Maravić

Mazzitelli

Mancuso

et al. 2023

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Out of the 26 included studies, 5 were RCTs, [30][31][32][33][34] 1 CCT, 35 9 were prospective, [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] and 11 were retrospective studies. 8,[45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54] The number of included SCs and FDPs was 5,102 and 474 respectively, retained by vital and/or non-vital abutments and/or a combination of both.…”

Section: Description Of the Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Twentythree studies included full-coverage SCs with a total of 2014 vital and 3088 non-vital teeth (1193 with fiber post, 1510 with cast metal post, and 385 non-vital teeth without post). 8,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]54 Six studies included both SCs and FDPs. 8,37,39,44,54 There were 219 FDPs retained by vital abutments 8,41,42,53 and 255 FDPs retained by non-vital abutment/s, 8,41,44,54 Twenty-two studies included a total of 3534 patients.…”

Section: Description Of the Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One study did not report the number of included patients. 8 The majority of the publications (n = 23) included metal-ceramic SCs 8,[30][31][32][33][34][35][37][38][39][40][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50]54 and/or FDPs. 8,41,42,44,53,54 Four of them also evaluated all-ceramic SCs 30,33,45,46 and one study only included all-ceramic SCs.…”

Section: Description Of the Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…36 The clinical outcomes of posts on root canal treated teeth restored with SCs were evaluated in 13 studies 8,31,[33][34][35]37,38,[45][46][47][48]52,54 and in two studies that investigated FDPs. 8,37 Fourteen studies assessed the longevity and clinical performance of SCs [30][31][32][33]36,39,40,43,44,49,50,51 and/or FDPs 41,42,44,53 retained by vital and/or non-vital abutments, or combination of both. Three studies used the United States Public Dental Health criteria (USPHS) 36,44 and a modified version 30 to evaluate the clinical performance of SCs.…”

Section: Description Of the Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Survival of fixed prosthetic restorations on vital and nonvital teeth: A systematic review

Hawthan

Larsson

2023

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeTo evaluate the survival rate of full‐coverage tooth‐supported fixed prosthetic restorations, single crowns (SCs), and fixed dental prostheses (FDPs), taking into consideration the potential influence of tooth‐vitality, presence and type of post, and type of prosthetic restoration material.Materials and methodsIn October 2022, two authors independently conducted a search in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus electronic databases as well as a hand search to identify clinical human studies on full‐coverage SCs and FDPs supported by vital and/or non‐vital abutments and/or a combination of both, with a minimum observation period of 24 months.ResultsOut of 4198 studies identified through the database search and 22 through hand searching, 26 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis of the present systematic review. Included studies scored six points and more according to Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale (NOS). The highest estimated 5‐year survival rate was observed for (metal‐ceramic and all‐ceramic) SCs on vital teeth (98.3%; 95% CI [98.1, 98.6%]) and all ceramic SCs on non‐vital teeth with fiber post (95.0%; 95% CI [94.5–95.4%]). Metal‐ceramic SCs on vital teeth (97.1%; 95% CI [95.6–98.7%]) showed a statistically significant higher estimated 5‐year survival rate compared to metal‐ceramic SCs with cast metal post (90.7%; 95% CI [87.4–94.0%], P < 0.001), fiber post (91.3%; 95% CI [90.9–91.6%], P < 0.001) and without post (85.7%; 95% CI [80.7, 90.6%], P < 0.032). All‐ceramic SCs with fiber post had a statistically significant higher estimated 5‐year survival rate (95.0%; 95% CI [94.5–95.4%]) compared to metal‐ceramic SCs on non‐vital teeth with fiber post (91.3%; 95% CI [90.9–91.6%], P < 0.001). SCs (all‐ceramic and metal‐ceramic) with fiber post had a statistically significantly higher estimated 5‐year survival rate of (92.7%; 95% CI [92.4–92.9%]) than SCs made of metal‐ceramic and retained by cast metal post (90.7%; 95% CI [87.4–94.0%], P < 0.001). For FDPs, the 5‐year survival rate was significantly higher for FDPs on vital abutments (84.9%; 95% CI [75.9, 93.9%]) compared to FDPs retained by non‐vital abutment/s (81.3%; 95% CI [80.3, 82.2%], P = 0.049) irrespective to presence, type of post, and FDPs material. The results are limited by the limited number of studies and the presence of uncontrolled confounding clinical variables.ConclusionsWithin the limitations of the study, tooth vitality is suggested to contribute positively to the survival of SCs and FDPs.

show abstract

Longevity of metal-ceramic single crowns cemented onto resin composite prosthetic cores with self-adhesive resin cement: an update of a prospective analysis with up to 106 months of follow-up

Cited by 2 publications

References 34 publications

Resin composite cements: Current status and a novel classification proposal

Resin composite cements: Current status and a novel classification proposal

Survival of fixed prosthetic restorations on vital and nonvital teeth: A systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About