Longevity of posterior restorations in primary teeth: Results from a paediatric dental clinic

Pinto, Gabriela dos Santos; Oliveira, Luísa Jardim Corrêa de; Romano, Ana Regina; Schardosim, Lisandrea Rocha; Bonow, Maria Laura Menezes; Pacce, Marcos Antônio; Corrêa, Marcos Britto; Demarco, Flávio Fernando; Torriani, Dione Dias

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2014.08.005

Cited by 45 publications

(44 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This finding is in line with a retrospective study with 4 years of follow-up that found that CR restorations in primary teeth presented lower failure rate than GIC ones. 38 Although the MTC model did not found a significantly difference among CP, RMGIC, AM, and CR, the ranking based on probability of failures showed that RMGIC and RC are in the best position, with lower probability, CP and AM in intermediate position, and GIC in the worst position, consistent with the network meta-analysis findings. CR has a wide range of applications in Dentistry.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 72%

“…As an esthetic and versatile material, 39 it presents a lower annual failure rate (9.5%) in posterior restorations compared to other esthetic materials. 38 Furthermore, CR allows the preservation of tooth structure because of its adhesive properties. 40 On the other hand, RMGIC retains the advantages of GIC (fluoride release, biocompatibility, physiochemical bonding to the tooth, favorable thermal expansion and contraction) but present better fracture and wear resistance than GIC.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Is there a best conventional material for restoring posterior primary teeth? A network meta-analysis

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to compare the longevity of different conventional restorative materials placed in posterior primary teeth. This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA statement and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42016035775). A comprehensive electronic search without date or language restrictions was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Turning Research Into Practice (TRIP) and Clinical Trials databases up to January 2017, selecting randomized clinical trials that assessed the longevity of at least two different conventional restorative materials performed in primary molars. Seventeen studies were included in this systematic review. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were performed and relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias. Restorations of primary molars with conventional glass ionomer cement showed increased risk of failure than compomer, resin-modified glass ionomer cement, amalgam, and composite resin. Risk of bias was low in most studies (45.38% of all items across studies). Pediatric dentists should avoid conventional glass ionomer cement for restoring primary molars.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 72%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is there a best conventional material for restoring posterior primary teeth? A network meta-analysis

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A recent study demonstrated a significantly higher survival of CR restorations compared to GIC when placed in primary molars of patients from poor socioeconomic backgrounds. Moreover, children with a history of pulpal intervention presented higher risk of failure (23).…”

Section: Survival Of Endodontic-treated Primary Teethmentioning

confidence: 99%

Survival and Factors Associated with Failure of Pulpectomies Performed in Primary Teeth by Dental Students

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although endodontic treatment is widely recommended for compromised dental pulp, there is no information regarding the factors associated with failures in primary teeth. The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival and factors associated with failure of pulpectomies performed in primary teeth by dental students. The sample comprised patients treated at a University Dental Service and required endodontic treatment in primary teeth. The study investigated treatment-related variables and patient factors potentially associated with treatment failure. Pulpectomy survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier estimator followed by log-rank test (p<0.05). The analysis included 81 pulpectomies performed in 62 children (5.6±1.5 years). The survival reached 62.9% up to 12 months follow-up. Most failures occurred in the first 3 months (p<0.001). Teeth with carious lesions at the start of treatment presented more failures than those with restorations or history of trauma (p=0.002). The survival of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite was higher than the ones filled with GIC (p=0.006). Pulpectomy performed in two or more sessions resulted in more failures (p=0.028). Patients presenting gingivitis had more failures in the endodontic treatment (p=0.022). The failures of root canal treatment in primary teeth were more prone to occur in a short time and when the treatment was performed in teeth presenting carious lesions. The use of composite instead of GIC increased the survival of pulpectomies. Repeated sessions for endodontic treatment and lack of oral hygiene habits had a negative effect on the results.

show abstract

“…13 In our study a majority (n=114, 76%) would follow the classical surgical doctrine and restore with various materials, while a minority (n=36, 24%) would sealin the caries. Although longevity studies have shown that composites 14 and SSCs, 12 last longer in posterior primary teeth 15 compared to GIC 16 no agreement between dentists exists. Our study confi rmed this disagreement over which material was considered the most appropriate for a given clinical situation; in this case an asymptomatic class II "do" carious 74 with radiographic caries away from the pulp in a cooperative 6 year old (see x-ray inset in fi gures 1, 2 and 3).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Contemporary Dental Caries Management Concepts in Paediatric Dentistry: A Survey of Awareness and Practice of a Group of Gulf Cooperation Council Dentists

Hussein¹,

Halabi²,

Kowash³

et al. 2017

EDUJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Longevity of posterior restorations in primary teeth: Results from a paediatric dental clinic

Cited by 45 publications

References 25 publications

Is there a best conventional material for restoring posterior primary teeth? A network meta-analysis

Is there a best conventional material for restoring posterior primary teeth? A network meta-analysis

Survival and Factors Associated with Failure of Pulpectomies Performed in Primary Teeth by Dental Students

Contemporary Dental Caries Management Concepts in Paediatric Dentistry: A Survey of Awareness and Practice of a Group of Gulf Cooperation Council Dentists

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About