2008
DOI: 10.1177/1077559507311517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal Analysis of Repeated Child Abuse Reporting and Victimization: Multistate Analysis of Associated Factors

Abstract: Most child subjects of maltreatment reports to child protective services (CPS) are involved just once, whereas other children experience repeated investigations and victimizations. This study examines individual, maltreatment, and service-related factors associated with maltreatment rereporting and substantiated rereporting in a multistate context. Case-level National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System data (505,621 children) were analyzed. Within 24 months, 22% of children were rereported, and 7% were rerepo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
141
2
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
10
141
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These variables represented predictor factors between the two groups. Although previous findings in the literature on maltreatment suggest that children with special needs and disability have a higher risk of maltreatment (Baker, 2007;Fluke, Shusterman, Hollinshead, & Yuan, 2008;Robinson & Rosenberg, 2004;Sullivan & Knutson, 2000), the findings of this study specifically associate a higher incidence of developmental problems with neglected children and a higher incidence of mental health problems with abused children. Because early mental health and developmental problems can both be a risk factor and outcome of both forms of maltreatment (Baker, 2007;Hildyard & Wolfe, 2002;Robinson & Rosenberg, 2004;Sullivan & Knutson, 2000), it remains unclear why mental health problems are more prevalent among abused children, whereas developmental problems are more prevalent among neglected children and further research is needed to explore this question.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…These variables represented predictor factors between the two groups. Although previous findings in the literature on maltreatment suggest that children with special needs and disability have a higher risk of maltreatment (Baker, 2007;Fluke, Shusterman, Hollinshead, & Yuan, 2008;Robinson & Rosenberg, 2004;Sullivan & Knutson, 2000), the findings of this study specifically associate a higher incidence of developmental problems with neglected children and a higher incidence of mental health problems with abused children. Because early mental health and developmental problems can both be a risk factor and outcome of both forms of maltreatment (Baker, 2007;Hildyard & Wolfe, 2002;Robinson & Rosenberg, 2004;Sullivan & Knutson, 2000), it remains unclear why mental health problems are more prevalent among abused children, whereas developmental problems are more prevalent among neglected children and further research is needed to explore this question.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Childhood involvement with the child welfare system might indicate that the experienced maltreatment was of reduced severity (i.e., time-limited because intervention caused maltreatment to cease) and thus would be expected to have less effect on later substance abuse and other dysfunction. On the other hand, it is possible that more severe maltreatment, in multiply-disadvantaged families with multiple functioning problems, is more likely to be detected by child welfare authorities, and child-welfare recidivism is a common problem (Fluke et al 2008).…”
Section: Complexities Of Child Maltreatment Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the total child welfare recurrence rates in Ontario are not well known. Estimates of recurrence rates in the United States indicate that 16% of all cases are reopened within 24 months of the initial investigation, and a further 6% within an additional 12 months (Fluke, Shusterman, Hollinshead, & Yuan, 2008). Although there is debate with regards to the difference between recurrence and re-opening, for the purposes of this study the two concepts are discussed within the same context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%