Longitudinal Assessment of Narrative Profile in a Williams Syndrome Patient

Fernández-Prieto, Montse; Sampaio, Adriana; Lens, María; Carracedo, Ángel; Gonçalves, Óscar F.

doi:10.1179/096979511798967142

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…They showed low levels of structural coherence and complexity, and moderate levels of content diversity and emotional commitment with the storytelling, relying on diversity of narrative content at the expense of narrative coherence ( Gonçalves et al, 2010 ). In a longitudinal single-case study, a young adult with WS, after an intervention devised to promote a number of linguistic and cognitive abilities, maintained the reference to affective states along with the use of evaluative devices, but failed to improve the production of cognitive inferences necessary to build up the narrative coherence ( Fernández-Prieto et al, 2011 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Explicit Oral Narrative Intervention for Students with Williams Syndrome

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Narrative skills play a crucial role in organizing experience, facilitating social interaction and building academic discourse and literacy. They are at the interface of cognitive, social, and linguistic abilities related to school engagement. Despite their relative strengths in social and grammatical skills, students with Williams syndrome (WS) do not show parallel cognitive and pragmatic performance in narrative generation tasks. The aim of the present study was to assess retelling of a TV cartoon tale and the effect of an individualized explicit instruction of the narrative structure. Participants included eight students with WS who attended different special education levels. Narratives were elicited in two sessions (pre and post intervention), and were transcribed, coded and analyzed using the tools of the CHILDES Project. Narratives were coded for productivity and complexity at the microstructure and macrostructure levels. Microstructure productivity (i.e., length of narratives) included number of utterances, clauses, and tokens. Microstructure complexity included mean length of utterances, lexical diversity and use of discourse markers as cohesive devices. Narrative macrostructure was assessed for textual coherence through the Pragmatic Evaluation Protocol for Speech Corpora (PREP-CORP). Macrostructure productivity and complexity included, respectively, the recall and sequential order of scenarios, episodes, events and characters. A total of four intervention sessions, lasting approximately 20 min, were delivered individually once a week. This brief intervention addressed explicit instruction about the narrative structure and the use of specific discourse markers to improve cohesion of story retellings. Intervention strategies included verbal scaffolding and modeling, conversational context for retelling the story and visual support with pictures printed from the cartoon. Results showed significant changes in WS students’ retelling of the story, both at macro- and microstructure levels, when assessed following a 2-week interval. Outcomes were better in microstructure than in macrostructure, where sequential order (i.e., complexity) did not show significant improvement. These findings are consistent with previous research supporting the use of explicit oral narrative intervention with participants who are at risk of school failure due to communication impairments. Discussion focuses on how assessment and explicit instruction of narrative skills might contribute to effective intervention programs enhancing school engagement in WS students.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%