2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11357-022-00676-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal association of executive function and structural network controllability in the aging brain

Abstract: Executive function encompasses effortful cognitive processes that are particularly susceptible to aging. Functional brain networks supporting executive function—such as the frontoparietal control network and the multiple demand system—have been extensively investigated. However, it remains unclear how structural networks facilitate and constrain the dynamics of functional networks to contribute to aging-related executive function declines. We examined whether changes in structural network modal controllability… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relatedly, a wealth of evidence concludes that such WM networks implement cognitive control mechanisms necessary for LP: (i) the SLF II and CG bundle along the anterior cingulate area (Net 16) (Hafkemeijer et al, 2014; Roger, Rodrigues De Almeida, et al, 2022), with the cingulum bundle being closely linked with inhibition tasks (Ribeiro et al, 2023); (ii) the anterior cortico-subcortical pathways (Net 11), especially right striato-prefrontal pathways (Buckner, 2004; Webb et al, 2020) and the right anterior thalamic radiations for response inhibition (Ribeiro et al, 2023); (iii) the SLF II and MLF for mental flexibility (Net 5) (Ribeiro et al, 2023; Rizio & Diaz, 2016; Troutman & Diaz, 2020). The link between DG and LP is further evidenced by a recent longitudinal study showing that the inability of structural brain networks to facilitate effortful brain state transitions is primarily associated with a deficit in executive functions (Tang et al, 2023). Of note, LC1 was also associated with minor sentence comprehension difficulties in late middle age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Relatedly, a wealth of evidence concludes that such WM networks implement cognitive control mechanisms necessary for LP: (i) the SLF II and CG bundle along the anterior cingulate area (Net 16) (Hafkemeijer et al, 2014; Roger, Rodrigues De Almeida, et al, 2022), with the cingulum bundle being closely linked with inhibition tasks (Ribeiro et al, 2023); (ii) the anterior cortico-subcortical pathways (Net 11), especially right striato-prefrontal pathways (Buckner, 2004; Webb et al, 2020) and the right anterior thalamic radiations for response inhibition (Ribeiro et al, 2023); (iii) the SLF II and MLF for mental flexibility (Net 5) (Ribeiro et al, 2023; Rizio & Diaz, 2016; Troutman & Diaz, 2020). The link between DG and LP is further evidenced by a recent longitudinal study showing that the inability of structural brain networks to facilitate effortful brain state transitions is primarily associated with a deficit in executive functions (Tang et al, 2023). Of note, LC1 was also associated with minor sentence comprehension difficulties in late middle age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…First, enhanced functional integration within the FPN control can be related to improved information transfer (Bagarinao et al, 2020), task processing flexibility (Bertolero et al, 2015; Tang et al, 2023), and overall better cognitive performance (Deery et al, 2023; Setton et al, 2022; Stanford et al, 2022). Through their precise adjustments of connectivity among adjacent regions (Bertolero et al, 2018), connector hubs imbue the network with integrative and flexible properties, thereby offsetting any decrease in specialization (as suggested by Cabeza et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these changes, mechanisms that mitigate age-associated changes in network controllability have been relatively understudied. For modal controllability, a quantification of a brain region’s ability to push the brain into difficult to reach states [55, 59], recent work has found longitudinal changes in a multiple demand system in aging that could underly age-associated declines in executive function [33]. Other work demonstrated that the ability of temporal-parietal regions to control other brain regions decreases with age, and is particularly vulnerable to simulated lesions [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Network controllability has been postulated as a dual mechanism of brain and cognitive reserve in aging by combining structural connectivity and brain dynamics to jointly measure the brain’s ability to respond and adapt to changing cognitive demands [32]. Recent studies have documented the centrality of changes in network controllability in aging [33, 34]. It nevertheless remains unknown how the brain could mitigate age-associated changes in network controllability despite changes in network topology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%