2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05449-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal bone microarchitectural changes are best detected using image registration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We performed three-dimensional (3D) image registration to ensure the same bone volume was assessed at each time point ( figure 1 ). 14 15 Morphological measures included total vBMD (Tt.vBMD; mg HA/cm 3 ) and trabecular vBMD (Tb.vBMD; mg HA/cm 3 ), trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV; %), trabecular number (Tb.N; 1/mm), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th; mm) and trabecular separation (Tb.Sp; mm); cortical vBMD (Ct.vBMD; mg HA/cm 3 ), cortical thickness (Ct.Th, mm) and cortical porosity (Ct.Po; %). 11 12 Failure load (F.Load; N) was estimated by finite element analysis on unregistered images (FAIM, V.8.0, Numerics88 Solutions).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed three-dimensional (3D) image registration to ensure the same bone volume was assessed at each time point ( figure 1 ). 14 15 Morphological measures included total vBMD (Tt.vBMD; mg HA/cm 3 ) and trabecular vBMD (Tb.vBMD; mg HA/cm 3 ), trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV; %), trabecular number (Tb.N; 1/mm), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th; mm) and trabecular separation (Tb.Sp; mm); cortical vBMD (Ct.vBMD; mg HA/cm 3 ), cortical thickness (Ct.Th, mm) and cortical porosity (Ct.Po; %). 11 12 Failure load (F.Load; N) was estimated by finite element analysis on unregistered images (FAIM, V.8.0, Numerics88 Solutions).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants’ non‐dominant radius and left tibia were assessed with HR‐pQCT (nominal isotropic voxel of 60.7 μm, XtremeCT II, Scanco Medical, Bruttisellen, Switzerland), following three‐dimensional image registration ( 9 ) at baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. At each site, standard variables including trabecular bone volume fraction (Tb.BV/TV, %), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th, mm), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp, mm) and cortical thickness (Ct.Th, mm) were measured.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent studies have shown that preprocessing of the images using rigid 3D registration provides a more accurate method to assess changes in bone microarchitecture because the same region of interest (ROI) can be analyzed in longitudinally acquired images. ( 8 ) Longitudinal imaging and 3D‐image registration are tools provided in the scanner software, but have yet to be adopted into the standard patient evaluation for HRpQCT images. Although these techniques have allowed for quantification of localized microstructural remodeling in cohorts of 10 or fewer patients with decreased bone quality and disease, ( 9–11 ) the methods used to date in patients have diverged from the methods used to quantify formation and resorption in animal studies ( 12,13 ) and have been inconsistent in the specific parameters used for quantification of remodeling (i.e., mineral density‐based thresholds and noise reduction techniques).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%