2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal causal effect of modified creatinine index on all-cause mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease: Accounting for time-varying confounders using G-estimation

Abstract: Background Standard regression modeling may cause biased effect estimates in the presence of time-varying confounders affected by prior exposure. This study aimed to quantify the relationship between declining in modified creatinine index (MCI), as a surrogate marker of lean body mass, and mortality among end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients using G-estimation accounting appropriately for time-varying confounders. Methods A retrospective cohort of all registered ESRD patients (n = 553) was constructed ove… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 72 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference depends on the severity of kidney damage (Iseki et al, 1997;Nugent et al, 2021). Generally, serum creatinine levels experience a significant increase when it is at the stage of end-stage renal disease (Aryaie et al, 2022;Cohen et al, 2019). In the group of rats that controlled their blood glucose using metformin, there appeared to be a significant difference in their urine creatinine levels compared to the diabetes group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference depends on the severity of kidney damage (Iseki et al, 1997;Nugent et al, 2021). Generally, serum creatinine levels experience a significant increase when it is at the stage of end-stage renal disease (Aryaie et al, 2022;Cohen et al, 2019). In the group of rats that controlled their blood glucose using metformin, there appeared to be a significant difference in their urine creatinine levels compared to the diabetes group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%