2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal changes in dental arches from mixed to permanent dentition in a Turkish population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
25
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
25
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the studies by others authors (9-11,13,18,21) our results partly coincide with theirs, as they observed that the UICD diminished in both males and females. Both our work and the above mentioned studies contradict the Knott's (6) observations for whom the ICD remained stable after reaching permanent dentition, even in other ethnic group's studies (16)(17)(18).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the studies by others authors (9-11,13,18,21) our results partly coincide with theirs, as they observed that the UICD diminished in both males and females. Both our work and the above mentioned studies contradict the Knott's (6) observations for whom the ICD remained stable after reaching permanent dentition, even in other ethnic group's studies (16)(17)(18).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…In addition, others authors (14,15) found that the intermolar distance remained stable. Other ethnic group's studies observed similar results (16)(17)(18). Many authors (1)(2)(3)5,7,15,19) have also obtained an increase in arch perimeter until permanent dentition is completed and a diminution of this dimension with age, mainly in the lower arch (4,12).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Dental models were collected from the age of 13 years because this corresponds to the time when conventional orthodontic therapy is often commenced (26). Because dental arch dimensions vary between the different types of malocclusions, (19, 27–29) we standardized our study by including only a normal occlusion sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study revealed that the gender effect on all arch parameters except the maxillary arch perimeter in GP3 were insignificant. This result was in disagreement with Hassanali and Odhiambo (11) , and Arslan et al (12) , which could be attributed to different genetic and ethnic basis. The genetic backgrounds have an obvious effect in the inter-canine widths in both sexes and among all groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%