1999
DOI: 10.1081/ada-100101861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal Changes in Sexual Risk Behavior Among HIV+ and HIV− Male Injecting Drug Users

Abstract: IDU men in New York City have modified their sexual behavior toward safer practices. Lower levels of risk are found among HIV+ men, particularly those with more progressed HIV illness. Nevertheless, a substantial amount of sexual risk behavior remained in this cohort, indicating the continued need for education and intervention.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While there has been a reduction in the parenteral risk of infection among IDUs due to the increasing availability of legal, sterile syringes and prevention interventions (Kral et al 2004;Nelson et al 2002;Semaan et al 2002), the risk of sexual acquisition or transmission of HIV, HBV and other sexually transmitted diseases (sexual risk) still remains high among IDUs, because unsafe sex has been more difficult to prevent (Booth et al 2000;Dolezal et al 1999;Evans et al 2003;Friedman et al 2002). Younger IDUs may be especially at risk for both acquiring and potentially transmitting HIV and HBV, because they may be more likely than older IDUs to share injecting paraphernalia, engage in unprotected sex, have concurrent sex partners (i.e., have sex with more than one partner in a given time period), and have highrisk injecting or sexual risk networks (Fennema et al 1997;Fuller et al 2003;Kral et al 2003;van Ameijden and Coutinho, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there has been a reduction in the parenteral risk of infection among IDUs due to the increasing availability of legal, sterile syringes and prevention interventions (Kral et al 2004;Nelson et al 2002;Semaan et al 2002), the risk of sexual acquisition or transmission of HIV, HBV and other sexually transmitted diseases (sexual risk) still remains high among IDUs, because unsafe sex has been more difficult to prevent (Booth et al 2000;Dolezal et al 1999;Evans et al 2003;Friedman et al 2002). Younger IDUs may be especially at risk for both acquiring and potentially transmitting HIV and HBV, because they may be more likely than older IDUs to share injecting paraphernalia, engage in unprotected sex, have concurrent sex partners (i.e., have sex with more than one partner in a given time period), and have highrisk injecting or sexual risk networks (Fennema et al 1997;Fuller et al 2003;Kral et al 2003;van Ameijden and Coutinho, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Studies conducted over the past decade with HIV-positive IDU men have consistently shown that, following an HIV-positive test result, many men do reduce their injection and sexual risk behaviors, although 25 to 50% continue to engage in high-risk behaviors. [12][13][14][15] Studies among HIV-positive IDU men found that more advanced HIV illness was associated with decreased sexual risk behavior 16 and that among HIV-positive IDU men and women, lack of social support, avoidant coping after an HIV-positive test, and low HIV/AIDS knowledge were associated with continued sexual and injection risk behaviors. 17 Previous studies with IDUs, regardless of serostatus, have shown that it is more difficult to change the sexual risk behaviors with main or primary partners compared with casual sex partners.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies examined different types of targeted interventions to reduce sexual risks with varying results, but most achieving some level of success (Rietmeijer et al, 1996;Sterk et al, 2003). Nevertheless, in many of the studies, levels of unprotected sex remained high even with reductions (Dolezal et al, 1999), and despite the success of specific interventions, they have not been implemented on any large scale (Metzger and Navaline, 2003;Strathdee and Sherman, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of sexual risk behavior reports have focused on cross-sectional patterns, with few looking more closely at individual patterns over time (Dolezal et al, 1999;Kral et al, 2001;Nelson et al, 2002). The absence of any significant upward trends in condom use underlines the fact that more targeted sexual risk behavior interventions are needed in IDU populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%