2015
DOI: 10.1080/03004430.2015.1092141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal effects of a two-generation preschool programme on receptive language skill in low-income Canadian children to age 10 years

Abstract: We explored longitudinal effects of a two-generation preschool programme on receptive language scores in children (n = 78) at age 10 years, living with low income. Scores at four time-points, programme intake, exit, age 7, and age 10 years were measured using the Peabody picture vocabulary test (3rd ed.). Effects of culture (Aboriginal, other Canadian-born, and recent immigrant), and gender of the children were explored. Between programme intake and age 10, scores improved significantly, F(3, 75) = 21.11, p < … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(, ) and Mughal et al . () as a very different intervention (a parent and child programme) and outcome measure (within‐child improvement in an age‐standardised measure) was used in these papers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(, ) and Mughal et al . () as a very different intervention (a parent and child programme) and outcome measure (within‐child improvement in an age‐standardised measure) was used in these papers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mughal et al . () used follow‐up data on the same children to compare subsequent development across Indigenous Canadian children, other Canadian‐born children and migrant children. Although the total sample is further reduced to 78 (21 Indigenous children) and the results should be interpreted with caution, the effects of the programme on Indigenous Canadian children were maintained up to age 10.…”
Section: Indigenous Childcare Use and Child Development: The Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional research at age 7 and 10 years has been published elsewhere, see Benzies, Tough, Edwards, Mychasiuk, and Donnelly (), Benzies et al. (), and Mughal, Ginn, Perry, and Benzies (). Although measures at data collection points in the ongoing longitudinal study were wide‐ranging, children's receptive language (a proxy for school readiness) was the measure chosen for participant selection for this mixed methods study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mughal et al (2015) used follow-up data on the same children to compare subsequent development across Indigenous Canadian children, other Canadian-born children and migrant children. Although the total sample is further reduced (n=78) and the results should be interpreted with caution, the effects of the program on Indigenous Canadian children were maintained up to age 10.…”
Section: Impacts Of Childcare Usage On Indigenous Children's Cognitivmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this could be due to the much larger sample size available when using the LSAC (compared to using LSIC). It is difficult to compare the results in this paper to those for some other Indigenous populations as a very different intervention (a parent and child programme) and outcome measure (within-child improvement in an age-standardised measure) was used in the Benzies et al (2011Benzies et al ( , 2014 and Mughal et al (2015) papers. The Gormley et al (2005) paper estimated effects of around 0.6 to 0.9 of a standard deviation for Native Americans, depending on the cognitive outcome measure, which is more substantial than our estimate, possibly because the intervention is a pre-kindergarten programme rather than just childcare.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%