2014
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2013.2997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal Follow-Up of Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: Outcome at Two, Five, and Ten Years Post-Injury

Abstract: The deleterious consequences of traumatic brain injury (TBI) impair capacity to return to many avenues of pre-morbid life. However, there has been limited longitudinal research examining outcome beyond five years post-injury. The aim of this study was to examine aspects of function, previously shown to be affected following TBI, over a span of 10 years. One hundred and forty one patients with TBI were assessed at two, five, and 10 years post-injury using the Structured Outcome Questionnaire. Fatigue and balanc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

16
280
3
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 489 publications
(304 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
16
280
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study, however, with > 140 TBI patients, has reported that the overall problems present at 2 years post-injury (cognitive, communication, behavioral, and emotional problems that were present in 60% of the cases) persisted even at 10 years post-injury. 71 Therefore, in a chronic mTBI group such as ours, where 6/11 were > 2 years post-TBI, significant improvements in cognition would not be expected. (Each of our 11 participants improved by at least + 1 SD, on the Stroop and/or the CVLT, post-LED.)…”
Section: Naeser Et Almentioning
confidence: 79%
“…A recent study, however, with > 140 TBI patients, has reported that the overall problems present at 2 years post-injury (cognitive, communication, behavioral, and emotional problems that were present in 60% of the cases) persisted even at 10 years post-injury. 71 Therefore, in a chronic mTBI group such as ours, where 6/11 were > 2 years post-TBI, significant improvements in cognition would not be expected. (Each of our 11 participants improved by at least + 1 SD, on the Stroop and/or the CVLT, post-LED.)…”
Section: Naeser Et Almentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Individuals who have sustained TBI frequently experience changes in their physical, cognitive, behavioral, emotional, and/or psychosocial functioning, leading to longer-term disability. [16][17][18] Decision-making impairment is a common neurobehavioral consequence of severe TBI. [19] Decision-making difficulties primarily relate to damage to the prefrontal areas and frontal systems, which are particularly vulnerable to injury in TBI.…”
Section: The Impact Of Tbi On Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 60% of participants reported negative changes in cognition, communication, behavior, and emotional functioning at all three time points. Less than 50% of the sample were employed at each time point and, overall, problems reported at two-years post-injury persisted at 10-years post-injury [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…When considering use of campus resources or supports, many participants had never heard of or accessed campus disability services (44.8%), campus counseling services (77.4%), or campus medical services (77.4%) [6]. Ponsford et al (2014), conducted a 10-year longitudinal study to better understand the long-term functional consequences of TBI. One hundred and forty-one patients with a TBI were assessed at two-, five-, and 10-years post-injury using a functional outcome questionnaire.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%