2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-56970-3_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal Genotype-Phenotype Association Study via Temporal Structure Auto-learning Predictive Model

Abstract: With rapid progress in high-throughput genotyping and neuroimaging, imaging genetics has gained significant attention in the research of complex brain disorders, such as Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). The genotype-phenotype association study using imaging genetic data has the potential to reveal genetic basis and biological mechanism of brain structure and function. AD is a progressive neurodegenerative disease, thus, it is crucial to look into the relations between SNPs and longitudinal variations of neuroimaging … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, since AD is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, multiple records can be obtained to monitor the disease's progression. Thus it is beneficial to uncover the temporal relation among these longitudinal biomarkers (Wang et al 2012c;Wang, Shen, and Huang 2016;Wang et al 2017;Brand et al 2018). Second, while heterogeneous biomarker measurements, such as voxel-based morphometry (VBM), FreeSurfer, and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), are available for predicting disease status and/or cognitive performance, current longitudinal methods (Wang et al 2012a;Wang, Shen, and Huang 2016) often do not explore this multi-modal structure to boost prediction capabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, since AD is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, multiple records can be obtained to monitor the disease's progression. Thus it is beneficial to uncover the temporal relation among these longitudinal biomarkers (Wang et al 2012c;Wang, Shen, and Huang 2016;Wang et al 2017;Brand et al 2018). Second, while heterogeneous biomarker measurements, such as voxel-based morphometry (VBM), FreeSurfer, and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), are available for predicting disease status and/or cognitive performance, current longitudinal methods (Wang et al 2012a;Wang, Shen, and Huang 2016) often do not explore this multi-modal structure to boost prediction capabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the first limitation of longitudinal data, several proposed longitudinal prediction models (Wang et al 2012c;Wang, Shen, and Huang 2016;Wang et al 2017;Lu et al 2018;Brand et al 2018) uncover the temporal structure of brain phenotypes. However, these models treat the temporal biomarkers as a tensor, which inevitably increases the complexity of the prediction problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several machine learning models were established to depict the relations between SNPs and brain endophenotypes (Huo et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2012a;Wang et al, 2017;Yang et al, 2015;Zhu et al, 2016). In Wang et al (2012a), Zhu et al (2016), Wang et al (2017) and Huo et al (2018), the authors used the low-rank learning models or structured sparse learning models to select the imaging features that share common effects in the regression analysis. Yang et al (2015) applied the LASSO regression model to discover the significant SNPs that are associated with brain imaging features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%