1991
DOI: 10.1002/mpo.2950190205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal growth in children with non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma and children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Comparison between unirradiated and irradiated patients

Abstract: Longitudinal growth was studied in children treated for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). The aim of the study was to compare these children's growth velocity with findings in a previous study we performed on age-matched children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who received cranial irradiation. Nine children with NHL with an onset time of treatment between 4 and 9 years of age (mean 6.5 years) were studied with annual body measurements taken from the time of the diagnosis and thereafter annually during the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
1
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some authors have indeed observed such correlation. 15,16,18 We did not observe relationships between duration of follow-up, type of tumor, sex, age at diagnosis, and abovementioned parameters. Other authors have observed greater growth impairments in the youngest patients 10,18 and in girls.…”
Section: Chemotherapy and Growthcontrasting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, some authors have indeed observed such correlation. 15,16,18 We did not observe relationships between duration of follow-up, type of tumor, sex, age at diagnosis, and abovementioned parameters. Other authors have observed greater growth impairments in the youngest patients 10,18 and in girls.…”
Section: Chemotherapy and Growthcontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Furthermore, the issue has almost always been approached indirectly because, in the majority of cases, chemotherapy is an integral part of a combined treatment program with radiotherapy, [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] and for this reason the results of such studies are not entirely comparable with ours. These studies attribute a negative influence of chemotherapy on growth on the basis of the following observations: patients treated with longer or more intensive courses of chemotherapy exhibit less growth than those treated with shorter or less intense regimens, 10,15,16,18 and patients treated with both radiotherapy and chemotherapy have less growth than those treated exclusively with radiotherapy. 17 In most of these studies, an influence of chemotherapy on growth parameters (height/growth rate) was observed, whether as a reduction in the growth rate during chemotherapy followed by catchup growth 9, 12-14, 20-22 or in a "chronic" form with absent or reduced subsequent recovery.…”
Section: Chemotherapy and Growthmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There have been many reports of poor growth in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), especially during periods of intensive chemotherapy, but growth may return to normal during less-intensive periods and may show evidence of further catch-up after completion of chemotherapy (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13). Of greater concern are a number of retrospective crosssectional studies on survivors of ALL that describe reduced bone mineral density (BMD) at various sites (14 -16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%