2021
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-405958/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal immune profiling of a SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in a solid organ transplant recipient

Abstract: The underlying immunologic deficiencies enabling SARS-CoV-2 reinfections are currently unknown. Here we describe a renal-transplant recipient who developed recurrent, symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection 7 months after primary infection. To elucidate the immunological mechanisms responsible for reinfection, we performed longitudinal profiling of cellular and humoral responses during both primary and recurrent SARS-CoV-2 infection. We found that the patient responded to the primary infection with transient, poor-qu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ten weeks after discharge, the patient received antithymocyte globulin, methylprednisolone, and rituximab because of biopsy-proven acute T cell-and antibody-mediated rejection. Four months later, the patient developed mild COVID-19 illness with a different lineage of SARS-CoV-2 [134].…”
Section: Adjustment Of Immunosuppressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten weeks after discharge, the patient received antithymocyte globulin, methylprednisolone, and rituximab because of biopsy-proven acute T cell-and antibody-mediated rejection. Four months later, the patient developed mild COVID-19 illness with a different lineage of SARS-CoV-2 [134].…”
Section: Adjustment Of Immunosuppressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 On the other hand, the presence of neutralizing antibodies during primary infection may be insufficient to confer protection against reinfection, as recently illustrated by a case of a solid organ transplant recipient with COVID-19, whose underlying immune deficiencies (ie, low naïve T CD4+ pools) resulted in a poor neutralizing antibody quality insufficient to protect against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection. 2 To date it is not yet clear if SARS-CoV-2 reinfections are isolated events in individuals unable to mount an effective adaptive immune response, and ultimately what is required to develop strong humoral responses, or if they will be seen more frequently in the setting of newly emerging variants with the potential to evade immune response. Importantly, regarding this last point, in the SARS-CoV-2 Immunity and Reinfection Evaluation study, the variant of concern B.1.1.7 (renamed as Alpha variant) circulated during the observation period, causing nearly 50% of all infections, although not seeming to have an influence on the rates of reinfection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one hand, failure to detect antibodies in serum in an individual after natural infection or even vaccination does not mean that they will not rapidly produce antibody upon re-exposure to the same pathogen, which is attributed to memory B cells and long-lived plasma cells, with a more rapid and stronger response and thus mitigating disease severity or preventing reinfection altogether 12 . On the other hand, the presence of neutralizing antibodies during primary infection may be insufficient to confer protection against reinfection, as recently illustrated by a case of a solid organ transplant recipient with COVID-19, whose underlying immune deficiencies (ie, low naïve T CD4+ pools) resulted in a poor neutralizing antibody quality insufficient to protect against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection 2 . To date it is not yet clear if SARS-CoV-2 reinfections are isolated events in individuals unable to mount an effective adaptive immune response, and ultimately what is required to develop strong humoral responses, or if they will be seen more frequently in the setting of newly emerging variants with the potential to evade immune response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations