2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal relations between reading motivation and reading comprehension in the early elementary grades

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
55
1
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
4
55
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the stabilities of reading competence in the present study seem to be lower than the stabilities of comprehension measures observed in previous studies (Schaffner & Schiefele, ; Schiefele et al, ). This may be due to the longer duration of the present study (2 years) compared to other previous studies (1 year or shorter).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, the stabilities of reading competence in the present study seem to be lower than the stabilities of comprehension measures observed in previous studies (Schaffner & Schiefele, ; Schiefele et al, ). This may be due to the longer duration of the present study (2 years) compared to other previous studies (1 year or shorter).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…The present study provides empirical support for reciprocal effects between intrinsic reading motivation and reading competence for secondary school native students. This is in line with the findings of McElvany et al () and Schiefele et al () who also confirmed reciprocal effects between intrinsic reading motivation and reading competence in a sample of elementary school children. The present study also provides empirical evidence for the mediating role of reading amount in the effect of intrinsic reading motivation on reading competence for native students.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Less emphasized in the theoretical perspective of SDT is the bidirectional relation evidenced to exist between reading motivation and reading achievement (e.g., Morgan & Fuchs, 2007;Schiefele, Stutz, & Schaffner, 2016). It is important to keep this reciprocal relation in mind when considering how best to design literacy learning experiences that promote autonomous motivation.…”
Section: Pause and Pondermentioning
confidence: 99%