Longitudinal Remote SBRT/SRS Training in Latin America: A Prospective Cohort Study

Abstract

planning, delivery, and follow-up, and when appropriate, regulatory and billing issues. To facilitate consistent approaches to discussion of targeting, the American Heart Association 17-segment model construct was employed. For centers with a potential CRA case(s), interactive peer review was accomplished for targeting and planning, with the final decision for treatment at the discretion of the treating centers. Results: From 2019 to present, 50 centers have engaged with CNCR through our program, representing 11 countries across 5 continents. Following initial engagement, 35/50 (70%) have treated at least one patient (range, 1-7), with 82 patients treated to date. Ninety-seven percent (34/35) of centers have maintained active engagement with CNCR following initial treatment of their first patient. Subsequently, three of those centers have develop prospective IDE trials through the FDA. All centers have committed to engagement in a newly established international registry and enrollment on developing clinical trials. Conclusion: Cardiac radioablation is undergoing rapid uptake as a potential treatment for patients with high-risk VT, with the potential for wide variability in implementation. The CNCR remote education and peer review program has enabled rapid engagement with centers around the world, with a focus on best practices, establishing relationships for mutual sharing and collaboration, and encouraging prospective evaluation of safety and efficacy for CRA.

Anti-racist strategies for clinical and translational research: Design, implementation, and lessons learned from a new course

“…Overall, there were 3 case reports [34,44,45], one case series [46], 2 editorials [41,43], 2 letters [37,47], 2 review articles [48,49], 7 systematic reviews [35,36,[38][39][40]42,50], 2 retrospective cohort studies [51,52], an evaluation of mobile health applications [53], and a medical education report. [54] One case report noted the subject's race, without further comment [44]. The case series described a rare genetic disease using the term origin, reflecting geography or ethnicity [46].…”