2012
DOI: 10.1017/s0950268812002464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal study of Salmonella shedding in naturally infected finishing pigs

Abstract: A 3-year longitudinal study was conducted on a multi-site farrow-to-finish production system. For each of 18 cohorts at three finishing sites, 50 pigs were randomly selected. Faecal samples were collected every 2 weeks for 16 weeks. Salmonella was cultured from 453 (6·6%) of 6836 faecal samples. The pig-level incidence of Salmonella was 20·8% (187/899 pigs). Salmonella prevalence varied between cohorts and within pigs. The adjusted Salmonella prevalence decreased over the finishing period from 6·4% to 0·8%. In… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly to the U.K. experts, authors in the United States and Spain also agree and share the concerns that there is little indication that current cleaning and disinfection protocols are effective for Salmonella contamination control, and they question the economic feasibility of these interventions (Funk and Gebreyes ; Argüello and others ). The elimination of Salmonella in the farm environment is difficult and residual contamination might be responsible for new infections (Pires and others ). The lack of strong solid evidence which correlates good cleaning and disinfection procedures with lower pathogen prevalence makes it very difficult to convince producers to solidly adhere to these procedures.…”
Section: Biosecuritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly to the U.K. experts, authors in the United States and Spain also agree and share the concerns that there is little indication that current cleaning and disinfection protocols are effective for Salmonella contamination control, and they question the economic feasibility of these interventions (Funk and Gebreyes ; Argüello and others ). The elimination of Salmonella in the farm environment is difficult and residual contamination might be responsible for new infections (Pires and others ). The lack of strong solid evidence which correlates good cleaning and disinfection procedures with lower pathogen prevalence makes it very difficult to convince producers to solidly adhere to these procedures.…”
Section: Biosecuritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently infected pigs may become Salmonella shedders quickly after infection and for a median of 14 days (Pires et al., ), after which they usually turn into a stage of intermittent shedding (Nielsen et al., ; Kranker et al., ; Scherer et al., ). Thus, as expected, the proportion of shedders in group B was significantly higher (63.9%) than that for group A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, factors such as the intermittent shedding of these bacteria over time (Pires et al . ), the lack of sensitivity of the microbiological technique when performed on faecal samples from asymptomatic pigs (Hurd et al . ; Mainar‐Jaime et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At farm level, no differences in Salmonella shedding during the growing period were observed between the CG and the TG for any of the trials. However, factors such as the intermittent shedding of these bacteria over time (Pires et al 2013), the lack of sensitivity of the microbiological technique when performed on faecal samples from asymptomatic pigs (Hurd et al 2004;Mainar-Jaime et al 2008a) and the limited number of animals analysed in each group may have hindered the detection of significant differences in shedding between the CGs and TGs, at both 60 and 90 days of growing. At slaughter level, stress situations such as those associated with the transport of pigs to the slaughterhouse and with the lairage may have favoured the shedding of Salmonella from previously infected pigs (Hurd et al 2001a;Boughton et al 2007;Rostagno and Lay 2011), which may have allowed for the detection of significant differences in the proportion of shedders between the CGs and TGs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%