1985
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112085001707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal vortices imbedded in turbulent boundary layers. Part 1. Single vortex

Abstract: Detailed mean-flow and turbulence measurements have been made in a low-speed turbulent boundary layer in zero pressure gradient with an isolated, artificially generated vortex imbedded in it. The vortex was generated by a half-delta wing on the floor of the wind-tunnel settling chamber, so that the vortex entering the working section had the same circulation as that originally generated, while axial-component velocity variations were very much reduced, relative to the local mean velocity, from values just behi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vane-type VGs typically have height of the order of the boundary-layer thickness, h/δ = 1 (δ-scale VGs), although recent studies suggest smaller devices with h/δ = 0.1-0.5 minimize the device drag without hindering performance (low-profile VGs, see Lin (2002)). Detailed measurements of the flow structure of streamwise vortices and vortex pairs have been made by Shebaka, Mehta & Bradshaw (1985), Mehta & Bradshaw (1988), Pauley & Eaton (1988), Yao, Lin & Allen (2002) and Angele & Grewe (2007). Godard & Stanislas (2006) optimized VG geometry over a bump and found peak performance with triangular vanes of height h/δ = 0.37, length l/h = 2, yaw angle β = 18…”
Section: Vortex Generatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vane-type VGs typically have height of the order of the boundary-layer thickness, h/δ = 1 (δ-scale VGs), although recent studies suggest smaller devices with h/δ = 0.1-0.5 minimize the device drag without hindering performance (low-profile VGs, see Lin (2002)). Detailed measurements of the flow structure of streamwise vortices and vortex pairs have been made by Shebaka, Mehta & Bradshaw (1985), Mehta & Bradshaw (1988), Pauley & Eaton (1988), Yao, Lin & Allen (2002) and Angele & Grewe (2007). Godard & Stanislas (2006) optimized VG geometry over a bump and found peak performance with triangular vanes of height h/δ = 0.37, length l/h = 2, yaw angle β = 18…”
Section: Vortex Generatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several investigations into the interaction of relatively weak vortices, generated by half-delta wings on a flat plate, with turbulent boundary layers (Shabaka et al, 1985, Westphal et al, 1985, 1987, and Pauley and Eaton, 1988. Measurements of Shabaka et al (1985) show that circulation around the embedded vortex is nearly conserved, with a slight streamwise decay due to the spanwise component of the wall shear which opposes the rotation of the vortex.…”
Section: Embedded Vortex Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This creates new common-flow up arrangements that then lift from the surface and hinder the momentum transfer process. Detailed measurements of the flow structure of streamwise vortices and vortex pairs have been taken by Shabaka et al (1985), Mehta and Bradshaw (1988), Pauley and Eaton (1988), and Angele and Grewe (2007) and analysed numerically by You et al (2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%