2016
DOI: 10.3934/dcds.2016084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longtime behavior of the semilinear wave equation with gentle dissipation

Abstract: The paper investigates the well-posedness and longtime dynamics of the semilinear wave equation with gentle dissipation utt − u + γ(−) α ut + f (u) = g(x), with α ∈ (0, 1/2). The main results are concerned with the relationships among the growth exponent p of nonlinearity f (u) and the wellposedness and longtime behavior of solutions of the equation. We show that (i) the well-posedness and longtime dynamics of the equation are of characters of parabolic equations as 1 ≤ p < p * ≡ N +4α (N −2) + ; (ii) the subc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equation (1.1) arises as an evolutionary mathematical model in various systems for the relevant physical application including electrodynamics, quantum mechanics, nonlinear elasticity etc.. The asymptotic behavior of (1.1) has been investigated extensively by many authors (see for example [1,2,5,13,3,20,7,11,14]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Equation (1.1) arises as an evolutionary mathematical model in various systems for the relevant physical application including electrodynamics, quantum mechanics, nonlinear elasticity etc.. The asymptotic behavior of (1.1) has been investigated extensively by many authors (see for example [1,2,5,13,3,20,7,11,14]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He found the critical exponent p = N +2α N −2 (N ≥ 3) of nonlinearity f (u), and established the existences of global and exponential attractors in natural energy space. Recently, in [20] the authors considered equation (1.1) as 1 ≤ p < p * ≡ N +4α N −2 (0 < α < 1 2 ) and ε(t) = 1. When ε(t) is a positive decreasing function and vanishes at positive intinity, the problem (1.1) becomes more complex and interesting, one of the reasons is that the dynamical system associated with (1.1) is still understand under the nonautonomous framework even through the forcing term is not dependent on the time t. In [10], for these problems, Plinio, Duane and Temam described the solution operators, which still was called a process, as a family of maps U (t, τ ) : X τ → X t , t ≥ τ ∈ R, acting on a time-dependent family of spaces X t , that is, the norm of the original linear space depended on the time explicitly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6,34]), the subclass LS of limit solutions (cf. [10,32,33]), the subclass of Shatah-Struwe solutions (cf. [22,27,28,29]), and so on (cf.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13,14,20,36]) and that of the semilinear wave equation with structural damping or gentle dissipation (cf. [24,25,34,35]). And there have been extensive studies on the stability of exponential attractors when the perturbations are some coefficients of the evolution equations (cf.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%