Look Who’s Asking—Reflections on Participatory and Transdisciplinary Marine Research Approaches

Abstract

Marine conservation transdisciplinary researchers often get to the field with a previously designed question, often formulated outside the actual geographical, social, cultural and ecological setting in which the research projects are supposed to be anchored. Involving people on the ground in the initial phase of formulating the questions and setting the research agenda is still uncommon. Once in the field, transdisciplinary researchers may or may not have the support of local communities to sample their data, although they will regularly need to count on these same communities if a collaborative regime is to be pursued and informed by the research outcome. This paper discusses measures that can be taken by marine fisheries and marine conservation researchers to improve participation in, and ownership of, the research by local counterparts, most importantly members of the communities where research is being conducted. The data was generated with a purposively sampled survey of 18 members of our research networks. Key proposed measures derived from this data include: (1) build rapport; (2) engage and exchange; (3) be accommodating and attentive; and (4) be respectful. Knowing who is asking the questions and assuring that all stakeholders have a voice in this process becomes especially relevant under extreme circumstances (e.g., disasters, pandemics), when problems are numerous but can only be accessed by those on the ground. We advise for faster progress in transforming academic and funding environments for true “level-playing-field” transdisciplinary and co-designed research projects that can help change top-down research tendencies.

A sea of connections: Reflections on connectivity from/in Oceania

“…More generally, this special section outlines timely linkages between: (1) the relational turn in the social sciences and humanities as well as among some sustainability scientists (West et al 2020 ); (2) the integrative turn as a new era of biodiversity conservation, supposed to merge with both sustainable development and fisheries management objectives (Riera 2022 ); and (3) the inter- and transdisciplinary turn, aiming to ensure that many more critical voices—academic and non-academic—are heard (Breckwoldt et al 2021 ). Conceptually, we point out the relevance of articulating the notion of ‘boundary object’ with that of ‘friction’ for the analysis of the ‘sea of connections’ in Oceania.…”

Disaster impacts, resilience, and sustainability opportunities for Gili Trawangan, Indonesia: transdisciplinary reflections following COVID‐19

“…Although no position is bias-free, being close to a topic always risks potential biases due to personal attachment that needs to be reflected on as knowledge is co-produced. These issues are well-known in transdisciplinary sustainability science, which has an expanding pool of literature on the roles and processes of self-reflection on researcher and practitioner positionality, as well as the positive aspects of internal and local agenda-setting (Wittmayer and Schäpke, 2014;Horlings et al, 2020;Breckwoldt, Lopes, and Selim, 2021).…”

Canada's marine carbon sink: an early career perspective on the state of research and existing knowledge gaps

“…The community-specific approach would follow successes in mapping (Davies et al 2020;Bishop et al 2022), coastal management (Weiss et al 2013;Lombard et al 2019), marine conservation (Ban et al 2009), observational oceanography (Moran et al 2022), and fisheries (Weatherdon et al 2016;Turgeon et al 2018;Reid et al 2021). As ocean CDR and Indigenous involvement in the sector are both just emerging, any new collaborative initiative should follow recommendations made by Breckwoldt et al (2021), including (1) the need for participation beyond data collection, (2) acknowledgment and mitigation of an agenda mismatch between funded and needed research, and (3) emphasizing the power of the transdisciplinary processes of learning together.…”