2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2000.40010015.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lookback on donors who are repeatedly reactiveon first‐generation hepatitis C virus assays:justification and rational implementation

Abstract: A highly significant (<0.0001) correlation was found between the S/CO ratio on HCV EIA 1.0- and RIBA 2.0-positive or -negative results. An S/CO ratio >2.5 yielded an 89- percent sensitivity for RIBA 2.0-positive specimens, and donations with an S/CO ratio >2.5 had a 75-percent probability of being RIBA 2.0 positive. A policy recommendation to use the S/CO ratio to triage lookback would prevent unwarranted notification of 87 percent of recipients of blood from RIBA 2.0-negative donors and would result in a fail… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA HCV 2.0 strip immunoblot assay; Chiron, Emeryville, CA) was used to confirm the specificity of highly positive EIA. In a separate subset of 75 specimens with signal-to-cutoff ratios of 13, 70 (90%) were positive by recombinant immunoblot assay (authors' unpublished data), which is consistent with the findings of others [42,43].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…A recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA HCV 2.0 strip immunoblot assay; Chiron, Emeryville, CA) was used to confirm the specificity of highly positive EIA. In a separate subset of 75 specimens with signal-to-cutoff ratios of 13, 70 (90%) were positive by recombinant immunoblot assay (authors' unpublished data), which is consistent with the findings of others [42,43].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…al., 2001 [24] indicated that only 5% of positive samples have a S/CO ratio less than 5. This is supported by Centres for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta USA (CDC) and the Microbiological Diagnostics Assessment Service UK (MiDAS) [20], [43]. Their results suggest using S/CO ratio values to predict HCV-RNA positives, those that have been exposed but have cleared, and false-positive infections.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several CDC-sponsored and other anti-HCV seroprevalence studies have indicated that reactive S/Co ratios could be used to predict supplemental positive results (2,(5)(6)(7)11); most of these studies used EIAs (2,5,6,11). In the present report, the first fully automated random access diagnostic test approved by the FDA for the detection of HCV antibody, the VITROS anti-HCV assay, was utilized.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%