1980
DOI: 10.1016/0160-7979(80)90012-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Looking at levels of medicalization: A comment on strong's critique of the thesis of medical imperialism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
35
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…But, even when big data results capture all relevant dimensions of the problem under scrutiny (notwithstanding the problem of dimensions that are not amenable to digital data), data fundamentalism could still generate other issues. In addition to the question of reductionism, the overestimation of the epistemic power of big data techniques may lead to a second threat: it could encourage excessive "medicalization" (Conrad and Schneider, 1980). Medicalization designates "the expansion of medical jurisdiction."…”
Section: Overestimating Big Data's Epistemic Power: An Ethical Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But, even when big data results capture all relevant dimensions of the problem under scrutiny (notwithstanding the problem of dimensions that are not amenable to digital data), data fundamentalism could still generate other issues. In addition to the question of reductionism, the overestimation of the epistemic power of big data techniques may lead to a second threat: it could encourage excessive "medicalization" (Conrad and Schneider, 1980). Medicalization designates "the expansion of medical jurisdiction."…”
Section: Overestimating Big Data's Epistemic Power: An Ethical Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hypothesis we explore is that misinterpreting biomedical big data at the epistemological level can undermine the contributions such disruptive techniques could make, by rendering them ethically problematic. More precisely, we defend the idea that uncritical overestimation of the epistemic power of big data -for instance by conceiving data-driven science as a radical answer to the limitations of hypothesis-driven scientific research that irreducibly embeds human subjectivity -may lead to problematic reductionism and foster excessive medicalisation (Conrad and Schneider, 1980;Vogt et al, 2016). In addition, it may undermine the valuable contribution that big data tools could make to the practice of medicine, leading to automation instead of genuine personalisation (in which the traditional practice of medicine and the role of physicians in the therapeutic partnership with their patients would be preserved and enriched).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional medicalisation critique (see for example, Conrad & Schneider, 1980a, 1980bIllich, 1975) acknowledges that moving problems into the purview of medicine sometimes helps avoid moralising discourses condemning individuals for their inability to approximate norms. In the area of addiction, however, this idea has been firmly debunked (see for example Keane, 2002;Brook & Stringer, 2005).…”
Section: Looking At the Detailmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vários autores e autoras (Szasz, 1963;Pitts,1968;Freidson, 2009;Zola,1972;Conrad & Schneider, 1980) se debruçaram sobre o processo de medicalização da sociedade moderna. Embora as definições do termo apresentem algumas diferenças, pode-se afirmar que a medicalização é entendida como o processo através do qual problemas da vida cotidiana são definidos e tratados enquanto problemas médicos.…”
unclassified