2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10705-011-9442-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Looking beyond fertilizer: assessing the contribution of nitrogen from hydrologic inputs and organic matter to plant growth in the cranberry agroecosystem

Abstract: Even though nitrogen (N) is a key nutrient for successful cranberry production, N cycling in cranberry agroecosystems is not completely understood. Prior research has focused mainly on timing and uptake of ammonium fertilizer, but the objective of our study was to evaluate the potential for additional N contributions from hydrologic inputs (flooding, irrigation, groundwater, and precipitation) and organic matter (OM). Plant biomass, soil, surface and groundwater samples were collected from five cranberry beds … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Total organic N was also a major fraction (52%) of soil porewater TN. Ammonium was the dominant form of DIN in soil porewater (Table 1), consistent with an earlier study in Wisconsin (Stackpoole et al, 2011) and with the low soil pH typical of commercial cranberry farms in Massachusetts (measured soil pH of 4.8 [Kennedy et al, 2015] was within the 4 to 5 range typical of most farms [DeMoranville, 2008b]). Ditch water had an isotope value that was lower than that of irrigation water and precipitation and a Cl − concentration that was less than Cl − in irrigation water and soil porewater but slightly higher than Cl − in groundwater (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Total organic N was also a major fraction (52%) of soil porewater TN. Ammonium was the dominant form of DIN in soil porewater (Table 1), consistent with an earlier study in Wisconsin (Stackpoole et al, 2011) and with the low soil pH typical of commercial cranberry farms in Massachusetts (measured soil pH of 4.8 [Kennedy et al, 2015] was within the 4 to 5 range typical of most farms [DeMoranville, 2008b]). Ditch water had an isotope value that was lower than that of irrigation water and precipitation and a Cl − concentration that was less than Cl − in irrigation water and soil porewater but slightly higher than Cl − in groundwater (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The cranberry bed may exhibit as a net sink of N the properties of natural wetlands that promote retention of DIN (Johnston, 1991; Reddy et al, 1984) or, when modified by irrigation water additions, may act as a source of DIN to groundwater, although recent work suggests minimal subsurface transport of N from the cranberry bed to shallow groundwater in response to flooding (Kennedy, 2015). Specifically, NO 3 − retention may result from denitrification within the cranberry bed, as suggested by high dissolved organic carbon concentrations (0.6–99 mg L −1 ) and low oxygen levels (4–5% of air saturation) found in porewater of a Wisconsin cranberry field (Stackpoole et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dissimilatory reduction of ammonium may be an important process in peatlands, consuming 25% of nitrate inputs (Hemond, ), but still would represent a minor N output in the absence of nitrate. The acid soil conditions of peatlands may limit nitrification (Hayden & Ross, ; Hemond, ; Hill et al, ; Rosswall & Granhaullu, ; Urban & Eisenreich, ), which is consistent with minor amounts of nitrate observed in shallow soils of cranberry peatlands (Ballentine et al, ; Stackpoole et al, ). Given the low soil pH of 4.9 in Atwood Bog, it seems reasonable to infer that nitrate production via nitrification was also low, although other mechanisms that utilize organic forms of N may provide a source of nitrate (Spott, Russow, & Strange, ).…”
Section: Nutrient Budgetsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Floodwater and irrigation combined for 6.1 to 7.0 kg N·ha −1 ·year −1 , or 57% to 62% of hydrological N inputs. Floodwater and irrigation inputs of N were relatively low compared to a Wisconsin bog, which received ~11 kg N·ha −1 ·year −1 from floodwater and irrigation (Stackpoole et al, ). Source waters used to irrigate and flood the Wisconsin cranberry fields were about twofold higher in TN concentration (Stackpoole et al, ), which mostly explained differences in hydrologic N inputs between the Massachusetts and Wisconsin sites.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%