2013
DOI: 10.1111/imre.12013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Looking down or Looking Up: Status and Subjective Well-Being among Asian and Latino Immigrants in the United States

Abstract: Foundational theories of international migration rest on the assumption that immigrants maintain reference groups in their country of origin even after settling in a new place, while the transnationalism perspective suggests that immigrants maintain a dual frame of reference. This paper uses the nationally-representative National Latino and Asian American Survey to test the location of immigrants’ reference groups. I find that the relationship between various measures of subjective social standing and subjecti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
63
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This transition may result in subjective comparisons of social standing and well-being that favor less healthy dietary changes (such as ''an American diet is better'' or ''fast food is a luxury my family deserves''). Immigrants may maintain a dual reference framework, wherein they make nutrition decisions with reference to practices and values in their home countries, which might foster the consumption of unhealthy foods high status but unhealthy foods [37]. Our results contrast previous research addressing food insecurity and dietary intake [9]; however after controlling for time in the US the correlation coefficient was lower (q s = -0.19), losing its predicting power.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…This transition may result in subjective comparisons of social standing and well-being that favor less healthy dietary changes (such as ''an American diet is better'' or ''fast food is a luxury my family deserves''). Immigrants may maintain a dual reference framework, wherein they make nutrition decisions with reference to practices and values in their home countries, which might foster the consumption of unhealthy foods high status but unhealthy foods [37]. Our results contrast previous research addressing food insecurity and dietary intake [9]; however after controlling for time in the US the correlation coefficient was lower (q s = -0.19), losing its predicting power.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…Additionally, as people mostly compare their current conditions to those of the recent past (Helson 1964), immigrants who reside in the host country for longer periods compare the host society's current societal conditions more to past conditions that they experienced in the host country as opposed to the home country. Qualitative and quantitative studies mostly support the idea that the frames of reference shift partially from home countries to host countries over time, resulting in a dual frame of reference (Reese 2001;Menjívar and Bejarano 2004;Gelatt 2013;Franzini and Fernandez-Esquer 2006;Akay et al 2017).…”
Section: Channels and Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we expand on past work by moving beyond conventional measures of residential attainment, these more-specific measures are somewhat prone to subjectivity. It is widely acknowledged that in assessing their social position, immigrants make comparisons not only to those in their current countries, but also to those in their prior ones (Franzini and Fernandez-Esquer, 2006; Gelatt, 2013). Consequently, it is important to keep in mind in interpreting the more-subjective outcomes (in contrast to our more objective ones [ownership and household crowding]) that group differences can reflect both variation in real living conditions and variation in how comparisons are framed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%