Extensive research has documented the challenges that undocumented
immigrants face in navigating U.S. labor markets, but relatively little has
explored the impact of legal status on residential outcomes despite their
widespread repercussions for social well-being. Using data from the
1996–2008 panels of the Survey of Income and Program Participation to
impute documentation status among Mexican and Central American immigrants, we
examine group differences in residential outcomes, including homeownership,
housing crowding, satisfaction with neighborhood and housing quality, problems
with neighborhood crime/safety, governmental services, and environmental issues,
and deficiencies with housing units. Results from our analysis indicate that
undocumented householders are far less likely to be homeowners than documented
migrants, and also live in more crowded homes, report greater structural
deficiencies with their dwellings, and express greater concern about the quality
of public services and environmental conditions in their neighborhoods. In
comparison to native whites, undocumented migrants’ residential
circumstances are lacking, but their residential outcomes tend to be superior to
those of native-born blacks. Overall, our results highlight the pervasive impact
of legal status on stratifying Mexicans’ and Central Americans’
prospects for successful incorporation, but also underscore the rigidity of the
black/nonblack divide structuring American residential contexts.