2006
DOI: 10.1177/0734371x05281629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Looking for Evidence of Public Employee Opposition to Privatization

Abstract: Contemporary public administration encompasses a wide variety of service delivery options. During the past two decades, privatization has become an increasingly utilized and legitimized approach. The perception that privatization poses a threat to public employment is seemingly widespread. Indeed, public sector unions often challenge the adoption of privatization programs. There is little evidence that individual rank-and-file public employees oppose privatization, however. In this study, the authors develop a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
36
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, an interesting finding is the positive, significant role of public employee unions (p<0.05). Generally, because of the potential harm that contracting-out brings to government employees (such as job security, work conditions, and wage and benefits), public employee unions are always treated as major opponents of government contracting (Fernandez and Smith 2006). However, there is also some literature arguing that the existence of strong unions would push service provision out, because public administrators would like to get rid of political bargains with unions and increased in-house production costs resulted from unions' rent-seeking activities (Ferris 1986;McGuire et al 1987).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, an interesting finding is the positive, significant role of public employee unions (p<0.05). Generally, because of the potential harm that contracting-out brings to government employees (such as job security, work conditions, and wage and benefits), public employee unions are always treated as major opponents of government contracting (Fernandez and Smith 2006). However, there is also some literature arguing that the existence of strong unions would push service provision out, because public administrators would like to get rid of political bargains with unions and increased in-house production costs resulted from unions' rent-seeking activities (Ferris 1986;McGuire et al 1987).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proponents of privatization insist that the prevalence of inflexible, rule-bound public HRM systems has necessitated a higher degree of reliance on contractors who can hire new personnel and dismiss poor performers quickly (Lester et al 2010). The public sector can therefore utilize the capacity of the private sector to accomplish the so-called 3E principles of economy, efficiency, and effectiveness for greater flexibility, which is a key theme of many public sector reform programs (Fernandez andSmith 2006, Chun andRainey 2005).…”
Section: Defining Hrm Outsourcingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Tensions between contracted staff and permanent civil servants can cause relational and change management issues within the modified organization, reducing its performance (Fernandez & Smith, 2005;Fisher et al, 2008). Tensions between contracted staff and permanent civil servants can cause relational and change management issues within the modified organization, reducing its performance (Fernandez & Smith, 2005;Fisher et al, 2008).…”
Section: Contracting Hrm Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%