2015
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Looking for phase-space structures in star-forming regions: an MST-based methodology

Abstract: We present a method for analysing the phase space of star-forming regions. In particular we are searching for clumpy structures in the 3D subspace formed by two position coordinates and radial velocity. The aim of the method is the detection of kinematic segregated radial velocity groups, that is, radial velocity intervals whose associated stars are spatially concentrated. To this end we define a kinematic segregation index,Λ(RV), based on the Minimum Spanning Tree (MST) graph algorithm, which is estimated for… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This determination prevents a single outlying object from heavily influencing the uncertainty, which could be an issue if using the Gaussian dispersion as the uncertainty estimator. If MSR > 1, then the most massive cores are more spatially concentrated than the average cores, and we designate this as significant if the lower error bar also exceeds unity (see also Alfaro & González 2016;González & Alfaro 2017). Parker & Goodwin (2015) show that MSR can sometimes be too sensitive in that it sometimes finds that random fluctuations in low-number distributions lead to mass segregation according to our definition.…”
Section: The Mass Segregation Ratio Msrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This determination prevents a single outlying object from heavily influencing the uncertainty, which could be an issue if using the Gaussian dispersion as the uncertainty estimator. If MSR > 1, then the most massive cores are more spatially concentrated than the average cores, and we designate this as significant if the lower error bar also exceeds unity (see also Alfaro & González 2016;González & Alfaro 2017). Parker & Goodwin (2015) show that MSR can sometimes be too sensitive in that it sometimes finds that random fluctuations in low-number distributions lead to mass segregation according to our definition.…”
Section: The Mass Segregation Ratio Msrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method proposed and tested in Alfaro & González (2016) to look for kinematic segregation in stellar systems is based on calculating the kinematic index (Λ) and the Spectrum of Kinematic Groupings (SKG). The kinematic index Λ measures whether a target group (in this case, a group associated with a particular velocity channel) is more spatially concentrated than an average group with the same number of stars taken from the full sample.…”
Section: Velocity Spectra and Segregated Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SKG methodology detects a third grouping whose morphology looks like a filament (see Alfaro & González 2016, for more details of the analysed test-cases), which lies in the main diagonal form of the Cygnus OB1 association (Fig. 4bottom -right).…”
Section: Other Kinematic Features Inside the Associationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The search of patterns or substructures in the velocity phase space requires further improvement both in specific searching tools (e.g. Alfaro & González 2016) and in the precision of the kinematic data. Precise radial velocity measurements have allowed to resolve clumpy structures in four clusters: NGC 2264 (Fűrész et al 2006;Tobin et al 2015), Orion Nebula Cluster (Fűrész et al 2008), Gamma Velorum (Jeffries et al 2014) and NGC 2547 (Sacco et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%